Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
01-12-2001, 01:36 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Concord, MA, USA
Posts: 264
|
I would get the GT-40 or the Edelbrock. With the comp box intake you would end up losing low end power. Box intakes make more high end power, while the GT-40 will make power from idel. Change both the upper and lower though the lower is more restrictive. Look for a used intake, that will save some money. Good luck!
------------------ 1995 GT Black sleeper Edelbrock aluminum heads,Edelbrock aluminum intake,Edelbrock cam, 70mm TB,75mm pro-m mass air,Taylor wires, Underdrive pulleys,Equal length headers,K&N filter Flowmaster cat-back, Eibach pro rate springs lower control arms 3.73 rear gear New: Centerforce clutch,plan to remove a/c |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GT40 vs Stock lower intake difference | ca_mustang | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-02-2004 05:03 PM |
| 351W GT40 Lower intake needed.. | mardyn | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-15-2004 07:03 PM |
| GT40 intake good enough? | 91evilstang | Windsor Power | 8 | 09-02-2001 04:41 PM |
| SN95 MAC Intake Elbow | fastang | Windsor Power | 2 | 08-04-2001 11:33 PM |
| Need some professional advice - head work, valve springs, rockers, cam. pretty long. | AxemanZZ | Windsor Power | 15 | 01-11-2001 01:30 PM |