

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Backyard Mechanic/Chemist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Acton MA USA
Posts: 435
|
![]() According to stock car 1/4 times you will always be about 0.5 sec behind a Fox car with identical mods. That just means you gotta spend more to run with the 87-93's. There still is a real 5.0 under there so it will run the same after the mods.
I dont know how much of the diff is due to the setup of the 94-94 5.0 vs the heavier weight of the SN95. My dads 98 GT convertible is a much nicer overall car than my 90 even though I can blow it away stock vs stock, so that is someting to consider. ------------------ Frank W 90 5.0 LX coupe Daily driver. Silencer removed, K&N filter. Flexalite fan, 3 core radiator. FMS flywheel and Clutch 88 Notch 2.3L 5 speed Parts/beater car 74 Chevy Laguna Type S-3 305 fixing soon, getting a 454 to put in garage www.chevellepages.com/folingo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey were the 94-95 5.0's faster then the 96-98 4.6's? | 96_4.6 | Blue Oval Lounge | 14 | 05-15-2003 05:43 AM |
Two 5.0's at the same time and turbo probe smack down. | Dark_5.0 | Stang Stories | 9 | 08-09-2002 09:26 AM |
5.0's burning oil?? | MattwantsSpeed | Windsor Power | 8 | 05-27-2002 01:22 AM |
Icing the Intake on 5.0's.... | 95mustanggt | Stang Stories | 6 | 05-10-2002 09:24 AM |
V6 Camaros killing 5.0's regularly? | fastang | Stang Stories | 17 | 01-05-2001 10:10 PM |