

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Delta, B.C. Canada
Posts: 5
|
![]() I own both a 89 fox body and a 94, I find that the 94 is slower stock than my 89 was stock. The computer on the 94 is also shitter. but if you get a chip and the usual bolt ons you should be running about the same with the 87-93's
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey were the 94-95 5.0's faster then the 96-98 4.6's? | 96_4.6 | Blue Oval Lounge | 14 | 05-15-2003 05:43 AM |
Two 5.0's at the same time and turbo probe smack down. | Dark_5.0 | Stang Stories | 9 | 08-09-2002 09:26 AM |
5.0's burning oil?? | MattwantsSpeed | Windsor Power | 8 | 05-27-2002 01:22 AM |
Icing the Intake on 5.0's.... | 95mustanggt | Stang Stories | 6 | 05-10-2002 09:24 AM |
V6 Camaros killing 5.0's regularly? | fastang | Stang Stories | 17 | 01-05-2001 10:10 PM |