MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-24-2002, 01:20 AM   #10
6T9PONY
All about the Windsor.
 
6T9PONY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,052
Default

The HiPo 289 was rated at 271 GROSS HP--NOT NET HP! Rev stated this, but I don't think you caught it tinner. That 271 GROSS HP is actually somewhat comparable to your NET HP numbers. That's why your times are fairly similar. So the cars back then weren't "slower" than they are now. Horsepower is horsepower, and that hasn't changed a bit.

One thing that has changed is the way these cars put it to the ground. One reason why a 428 CJ/4-spd could only get mid 13s was because they used the skinny bias ply tires, Rev stated this also. The vintage suspensions are also inferior to the performance suspensions of todays sports cars.
6T9PONY is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new to fast mustangs but not fast cars...I've a few ?'s XGN Windsor Power 3 07-03-2002 09:40 AM
Are these fast?? Dark_5.0 Stang Stories 13 05-16-2002 01:19 PM
Super cars and Fast and the Furious #1 Pony Blue Oval Lounge 9 01-29-2002 12:54 AM
289's compared GT-40P's??? Coolbreeze Windsor Power 8 09-13-2001 12:10 AM
Pesky Supra, actually thought he had a fast car. Unit 5302 Stang Stories 7 03-20-2001 01:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.


SEARCH