Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
05-21-2001, 07:17 PM
|
#9 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Yes underrated, but in gross figures, not net. All in all, probably pretty accurate, maybe a little high. Those old 351's were 15sec cars. The 351 Cleveland was an engine that really hauled, but they add more expense and install problems.
You could spend your money and mod it up, or you could spend $500, pick up a solid running 5.0 HO and drop it in, and probably beat the pants off the 351. To boot the 5.0 will last, unlike the high compression high octane built for leaded fuel 351. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002. It Was A Pretty Decent Year | PKRWUD | Blue Oval Lounge | 21 | 01-07-2003 11:45 PM |
| 5.0L ---> 5.0L conversion | Rodoggx | Windsor Power | 8 | 11-25-2002 10:03 PM |
| Newspaper Headlines in the Year 2035 | MustangKelly96 | Blue Oval Lounge | 5 | 10-10-2002 11:20 PM |
| 1 year anniversary | 7up | Blue Oval Lounge | 10 | 07-07-2002 01:01 PM |
| Tricks for 5.0L in 96 Explorer AWD | scott93gt | Windsor Power | 0 | 07-02-2001 08:05 AM |