

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E-city, nc
Posts: 24
|
![]() I had this same problem. I had 4 cyl. springs and yes they do ride a lot nicer than others and give the car some weight transfer abilities, and sits about a 1in. lower than stock. But the springs are not your problem. Its the geometery of the rearend itself, meaning lower control arm geometery.
What I did that solved the problem is put chassis engineering lower control arms on, which are identical to the SSM and a little bit cheaper, and problem solved. It changes the center of gravity under a launch/load condition and thats why it fixes it. Hope this get you in the right direction. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Ford Mustang Frame Measurements | bigmac5300 | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 10-25-2009 01:15 PM |
Help me find this license plate frame! | Stang_Crazy | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 06-01-2003 07:15 PM |
Launch Lesson Please & 60' Times | SleeperGT | Stang Stories | 13 | 03-16-2003 05:01 PM |
Launch Rpm Vs. Stall Speed | ciara | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-16-2003 10:20 AM |
Roller rockers hitting valve covers like crazy. | FastGTragtop | Windsor Power | 4 | 07-27-2001 12:09 AM |