

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#15 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
![]() rppngears:
I see no real harm in using 93 octane (I use 94 and in 12 years I've never had the slightest gas-related problem) but as PKRWUD stated, running the lowest octane you can - without detonation - is probably the best way to go. If you can run advanced timing with 89 octane, go for it. If you can do it with 87, better yet. Experiment. My Mazda 2.0 runs 2-degrees advance with 87 octane, my Mustang won't do that and requires more. Every engine is different. The gas companies do claim the higher octane gas contains extra 'detergents' to help keep injectors clean. This sounds plausable and my injectors are clean after well over 100,000 miles of using 94 octane but I've also heard this is BS to sell higher octane gas which also sounds plausable. I basically ignore the 'detergent' factor (but suspect it's true from my own long-term experience) and just crank up the timing and fill up with Sunoco Ultra 94 every week. Works for me. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rumors about going faster | Coupe Devil | Windsor Power | 2 | 05-06-2003 09:12 PM |
Granada brake swap rumors? | fastsvo | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 01-22-2002 09:55 AM |
rumors | 1weirdone | Modular Madness | 1 | 10-02-2001 11:24 AM |