PC VS MAC On Photoshop

[PKRWUD]

Kell, you could sell ice to eskimos. LOL. You are funny! You're also so full os schit, I can smell you from here, but hey, as long as you're happy!

You don't seem to understand that I really don't give a flying phuck what you believe. YOU are not worth the time and effort, and you're wrong.

I DO know PC's. The one constant during the 8 month repair and networking course I took before getting certified, was that PC's, and Winblows in particular, are shotty, cheap rip-offs. They tried so hard to copy the Mac, but they failed. My 233MHz G3 will SMOKE my next door neighbors Gateway 1000MHz cow. I gotta admit, even that surprised me. PC's and Windblows just go so far out of their way to make things more work than they need to be. A two step operation on a Mac takes 8 steps on a Wintel machine, and the result is a joke.

Anyway, Kell, you go right on with your gag. I do think it's VERY amusing watching you spend so much on this arguement. LOL! You're a card!

James-

Yes you can build a Mac like a PC, except the Mac won't fall apart, or need every internal part replaced within a year.

Those were interesting links, but they weren't really relavant to this discussion. That first one was almost 2 years old. I did, however find my new favorite quote on the last one (where he was comparing the old Mac with the new P4, like all the others)!

Am I at a crossroads as a Mac user? Not yet. My conclusion above is based solely on raw speed. There are other factors besides speed to consider in choosing a computer. As a truly Unix based OS, Mac OS X is far superior to Windows XP in technical sophistication, not to mention "look and feel." The Pentium 4 running Windows XP may be a "Corvette" and the Athlon may be a "Viper" but the Power Mac G4 MP running OS X is a "Porsche Carrera Twin Turbo." And I'm a Porsche kind of guy.

Take care,
~Chris