

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#5 |
All about the Windsor.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,052
|
![]() Are you talking 350 rear wheel hp, or at the flywheel? 350 flywheel hp probably isn't enough for 11s... To get close to that you'll need to gut the car completely, have slicks that hook like mad with steep gears (4.11s like you said), and be able to launch the hell outta that C4 (transbrake/high stall). You're gonna have to do some work to that suspension, too.
I've had a C4 in both of my '69s, I have a shift kit, a 2500 stall, and a tranny cooler. The car is just driven occasionally on weekends and cool nights when the weather is good. If I did it all over again, I would go with a T10 Toploader 4-spd in a heartbeat. It will be more streetable (especially with a big cam), funner to drive, and you don't have to worry about burning your tranny up because your converter stalls high. If I was you I'd go with a carb, it would be easier since you wouldn't have to run any computer crap. Good heads, decent cam, good intake, 650 carb should get you 350 hp at the flywheel with a good tune. Definitely go with an electronic ignition (still haven't put one on mine yet ![]() Just a couple opinions and/or tips..... |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
speedy density to mass air questions | thdrcat | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-25-2003 09:20 PM |
Couple of quick, stupid questions! | SCOTTLT79 | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-15-2003 04:02 PM |
Very Stupid Question - Intake? | apenn | Modular Madness | 21 | 09-23-2002 09:56 AM |
Stupid questions | The Deuce | Modular Madness | 5 | 08-17-2002 02:59 AM |
stupid friend | fordkid68 | Classic Mustangs | 10 | 03-17-2002 06:56 PM |