
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
|
I think a 3" exhaust is a bit overkill for a 347. It will really sap your low-end.
I'd go with the 2 1/2" x-pipe (Hedman Headers brand). H-pipes are only good to 3k. The Hedmen made more power than pro chamber in a 5.0 Mustang and Super Ford test. ------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| h pipe or x pipe, and which ones | apowers2k | Modular Madness | 3 | 02-10-2003 12:09 PM |
| Off road pipe vs. Catalitic Pipe | Kamaro Killer | Windsor Power | 7 | 04-04-2002 04:05 AM |
| Mac H pipe w cats vs BBK x pipe with cats?? | Chevyguy | Windsor Power | 15 | 11-16-2001 08:34 AM |
| 2 chamber Flow with Off road H pipe | evilmustang | Windsor Power | 2 | 06-19-2001 08:13 AM |
| X pipe vs MAC Pro Chamber... | Phantom5oh | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-29-2001 02:36 PM |
