

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Moline Il
Posts: 901
|
![]() IMO, where the weight is placed is not as important as the overall weight. I want my rotating assembly as light as possible. If you were to take for instance, a 1 pound weight off of your flywheel that is approximately 5 inches from the crankshaft centerline, it might take a 2 or 3 pound piece of mallory to make up the difference in the counterweight of the crank, which is only 2 inches from the centerline.
If I was building a 10,000 rpm motor I would opt for internal balancing. The bearings in a motor of this type wouldnt have much of a life expectancy if it were externally balanced. The machine shop that I deal with tells me that internal balancing 'is a little easier on parts', thats all. Andy
__________________
88 coupe 91 LX NMRA Pure Street 5120 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rare Mustangs....Got One? | 1969Mach1 | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 09-25-2010 04:59 AM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:43 AM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Small Ponies | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Racer's Club House | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |