MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-17-2003, 12:48 AM   #1
Ron1
Registered Member
 
Ron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 439
Default

6 to 8 inches is plenty before the turn down. I looked at mine and it's about 3 inches before it makes the 45 degree bend. As far as back pressure, any, will rob power. What we should be talking about is velocity. The larger the exhaust, the velocity is absorbed by the larger pipe and slows things down. Does that create back pressure? I don't know if that can truly be defined as such. I'm not an expert but I do know this, the engine builders I have been around and some really good ones, believe that you want it freeflowing with VERY low or no backpressure. I think about it in very simple terms by visualizing what is happening inside that air pump. If it takes force to scavenge the exhaust, that is power being lost.
I think that this is why we use crank scrapers and windage trays, titanium keepers and valves, ultralite lifters and knife edge our cranks...to get weight out of the rotating assembly. It will RPM quicker and get into the power band quicker. The last thing I would want is to make some of the pistons work against a force that will keep them from reaching TDC. It can't be good for the motor.

But I have been proven wrong before...but let me leave you with a quote from David Vizard (Volume 1 ) "How to make HP: " Over the years I have heard many strange claims from so called experts. One I have heard proclaim more than once that a performance engine or any convential 4 cycle engine-needs some backpressure to optimize efficiency. That statement was obviously made by someone who had never used a dyno or had not carefully evaluated how exhaust systems flow affects performance. Let me assure you that by minimizing exhaust sytem backpressure, 999 out of 1000 times you will find more power. Keep in mind however that the air/fuel ratio and ignition timing are carefully optimized"

If you don't know who David Vizard is...well never mind.

Ron
__________________
65 Mustang Fastback
347 Stroker, C4 with 4.56
10.68 @ 122 N/A
9.74 @ 137 w/ N2O
www.fastspecialties.com
Ron1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
302 VS 351 weight diffrence notchrocket Windsor Power 10 09-28-2004 02:33 AM
94 tailpipes on 92 stanger9219 Windsor Power 3 07-12-2004 11:37 PM
3" H-Pipe and 3" Flowmasters into 2.5" tailpipes NewAge 5.0 Windsor Power 1 02-26-2003 01:13 PM
turndowns or tialpipes 93calcobra Blue Oval Lounge 11 10-21-2002 11:13 PM
Will any 2.5 inch tailpipes fit my flowmasters? Hethj7 Windsor Power 5 07-10-2002 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.


SEARCH