MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-15-2001, 10:48 AM   #11
silver_pilate
DURKA DURKA!!
 
silver_pilate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1997
Location: Lubbock, TX...(TX panhandle)
Posts: 1,418
Post

I'd have to bet that it was 35 cfm over the Edelbrock as well. Also, the article says that there were a few other minor improvements over the Edelbrock design such as slightly straighter # 1 and #5 runners in the lower and some minor port massaging which may yield some minor improvements.

Of course, for $300 ($200 cheaper than Edelbrock's), and even minor improvements, it looks to be a steal. I may wait until some tests come out for it, but I do need an intake pretty badly. Also, it should match perfectly with their 70mm TB/EGR combo.

--nathan
silver_pilate is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Explore intake??????????? William Bowers Windsor Power 2 02-14-2002 10:27 PM
HELP!!! oil in intake, what to do?? bosco Windsor Power 4 02-03-2002 05:02 PM
Edelbrock spec's and intake question?? jerryIII Windsor Power 0 05-24-2001 12:49 PM
OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' QUIN Windsor Power 8 03-09-2001 01:58 PM
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? gt93mustang Windsor Power 14 03-06-2001 07:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.


SEARCH