

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#11 |
DURKA DURKA!!
Join Date: Sep 1997
Location: Lubbock, TX...(TX panhandle)
Posts: 1,418
|
![]() I'd have to bet that it was 35 cfm over the Edelbrock as well. Also, the article says that there were a few other minor improvements over the Edelbrock design such as slightly straighter # 1 and #5 runners in the lower and some minor port massaging which may yield some minor improvements.
Of course, for $300 ($200 cheaper than Edelbrock's), and even minor improvements, it looks to be a steal. I may wait until some tests come out for it, but I do need an intake pretty badly. Also, it should match perfectly with their 70mm TB/EGR combo. --nathan |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Explore intake??????????? | William Bowers | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-14-2002 10:27 PM |
HELP!!! oil in intake, what to do?? | bosco | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-03-2002 05:02 PM |
Edelbrock spec's and intake question?? | jerryIII | Windsor Power | 0 | 05-24-2001 12:49 PM |
OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' | QUIN | Windsor Power | 8 | 03-09-2001 01:58 PM |
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |