

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ny
Posts: 197
|
![]() ultimately the dyno or constant track tuning is the best. however since neither is practical the vac method will work. although the vac drops to sero when you hit the throttle it will start to climb as you go.
a 650 dp will probably be the best choice for you if you want to drive it. there are alot of choices and advice. generally a 600 is good for a mostly stock motor reving to 5500 rpm. a mildly modded motor with juice likes a 650 dp. when you mod a motor alot and factor in the high rpm range in which you plan on reving then the 700 comes into play. vac. will not tell you what carb makes more power. and the math theory will only give you a carb guideline for a stock motor. if you are lucky enough to have some friends who use carbs, convince them to go to the track with you and try their carbs. when you find a carb that seems to be best you will know what is good for you. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
change jets or increase carb size | 82 GT | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-29-2004 07:30 PM |
Need opinions on new combo about headers and carb size. | ciara | Windsor Power | 2 | 10-05-2003 10:36 PM |
carb size | lskarritt | Classic Mustangs | 9 | 01-05-2003 03:01 PM |
to carb, or not to carb...this is my question. | black86notch | Windsor Power | 4 | 08-06-2002 08:24 PM |
Carb size? | 84_GT350 | Windsor Power | 23 | 02-27-2001 11:14 PM |