
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: NJ
Posts: 219
|
Quote:
If your shortblock is in good shape, your better off with a heads/cam/intake. You could go for a cast crank 347. Rotating assembly should run you $1k. Then the block would have to be notched, align honed, honed. Cost of final assembly, kit and machining would be over $2K. Then you go from there. Stock pan or aftermarket? Custom cam? Heads? Intake? Ive done, it aint cheap. You can go 11.90's with the proper heads/cam/intake/suspension on a stock 302 shortblock. Pat
__________________
347- 10.63@128 N/A |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 'super' stroker vs 'budget' stroker | mike5p01 | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-11-2003 10:11 PM |
| 87-93 GT 3rd Brakelight: Bulb part # | ponyboy25 | Windsor Power | 5 | 04-13-2003 08:48 PM |
| 351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
| Need advice. Would like to upgrade to 306-351 | NYC1 | Windsor Power | 16 | 07-11-2002 12:23 AM |
| stroker engine question | 82 GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 06-08-2001 03:22 PM |
