
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 432
|
Unless the lift on the cam is higher than stock, like approaching maybe .500, Im pretty sure you could run that ratio without a problem.
You still have the valvecover thing to worry about.
__________________
'91 Mustang GT 5.0 AOD Daily Driver Current stats: NEW 302 short block, E-303 cam (@.050, 220/220, .498/.498, 110 degrees), 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM heads (aluminum, 1.9/1.6, 60cc chambers), Cobra intake, Granatelli 75mm MAF, Billet AFPR, Equal-Length Shorty Headers, Off-Road X Pipe, Flowmasters, 4.10 POSI 13.73 at 103.8, ~2.2 60' |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Roller rockers for stock heads | QuantumMotorsports | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-14-2003 03:15 PM |
| Roller Rockers, bad? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 04-14-2002 01:35 PM |
| roller rockers | bobtodd | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-07-2002 01:34 PM |
| reg rockers or roller rockers?? | Chevysucks | Windsor Power | 1 | 12-05-2001 08:17 PM |
| Valve Springs & Roller Rockers | StreetStang37 | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-17-2001 03:54 AM |
