

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#16 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() Why bother using weenie cams in a small motor like a 302 that needs to rev to the moon in order to make anywhere close to what a basic 393 would?
If anything, the weakest cams are the hydraulic rollers. In order to get one of these to run high rpm's you need titanium retainers, beehive springs, an a custom ramp rate. With a flat tappet hydraulic, you can run 7000 rpms with a street friendly valve spring. With a solid roller, you're replacing your valvesprings at every third oil change and having to adjust your rockers every oil change (or 20 drag strip passes). This is fine for a race car but but sucks for a street car. Go to the corral and ask Buddy rawls what he thinks of flat tappet hydraulics.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rebuild / Build Up | Rosco | Windsor Power | 7 | 08-14-2003 11:52 AM |
347 Stroker Vs. 302 Build up | 5.0 Pony | Windsor Power | 19 | 02-27-2003 09:58 PM |
Cheap Cheap Porting Would it work? | vetteeatr | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 11-02-2002 10:34 AM |
Did you build you own house and garage?? | joakim | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 05-05-2002 12:44 PM |