
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Founder
Join Date: Jun 1995
Location: Michigan
Posts: 19,326
|
Quote:
Really, my argument for going with a 351W based mill though wouldn't have nearly as much to do with horsepower as it would regarding durability. Talking production blocks, of course. If you've got $2K to throw at an SVO block than it's not the same issue. However, when you build a higher horsepower based engine on a production type block the 302 just doesn't offer the durability and strength of the 351. When I was running my 302, squeezing it for all the power I could get (515 RWHP) the block went see ya later right on the dyno eventually. I've been running my supercharged 377 with a lot more power still than the 302 ever had and it hasn't flinch and inch. No more blown head gaskets and the block holds up. I wish I would have done the swap and built a 351 mill years prior. What headaches it would have saved me!
__________________
StangFlyer 1991 Mustang GT - Supercharged 377 Stroker 2000 Ford Lightning - Project Lightning Hauler Media Center Gallery - View my member photos |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Darius' dyno numbers - see Power Adders forum | drudis | Windsor Power | 2 | 08-25-2004 02:43 PM |
| disapionted with dyno numbers | 302crew | Windsor Power | 7 | 08-13-2003 10:22 AM |
| Stock 351 powered Lightning Dyno Numbers??? | daveGT | Windsor Power | 1 | 06-14-2002 09:51 PM |
| Powerdyne Dyno numbers and continuing frustration | 1995MGTS | Windsor Power | 17 | 03-31-2002 12:59 PM |
| Chassis dyno numbers | LfiveohX | Stang Stories | 22 | 08-01-2001 08:55 PM |
