Corrupt Government?

[Rev]

Originally posted by bigwhitecobra
So what if my communication skills aren't up to par, and my vocabulary isn't as vast as yours. Unlike you I haven't quite the time to read every tiny little tid bit of information essentually from the same source. By that I mean Officail Press Releases that have been censored to death. I should read and listen more, but I have a life to live. Not to say that you don't, however you do seem to spend an awful lot of time replying to these posts. Again....not doing anything but stating the obvious from an outside view. You must be really anal retentive. Are you married? Is your wife satisfied? Do you get freaky in bed? I'm not trying to be an jerk, just wondering. No more or less. Actually I sort of don't want to know. And just to make myself clear here, I AM NOT ATTACKING YOU. Nor am I trying to piss you off. Just trying to understand your train of thought, cause quite frankly you leave me flabbergasted. My mind just can't wrap itself around the concept of complete trust in people that we know lie to us, do anything it takes to get our votes, and then ignore us completely. I'm really having trouble with that.

Yeah, I do act 18 sometimes. So what? You should be so lucky. I am never going to grow old, as long as I am young at heart. Why do you think this site was formed? For the love of a Car you or we had in high school. How immature is that?

As far as conspiracy goes, if not trusting those in power makes me a wacko, so be it. I don't trust them.

Hope this clears up some of you concerns. And thank you for voicing them.


Yours Truely,

BWC

Don't take anything too seriously here BWC on a political issue. Jim Sweeters is sreally an OK guy from what I've seen over the last 5 years. He is well educated and writes very well.

My impression is that he is mostly a John Bircher / religeous right kind of guy that thinks he has everything pretty much figured out. He really doesn't tolerate apposing opinions very well.

My bet is that he was captain of the debate team in highschool and in college. He seems to see any differing opinion as an opportunity for debate rather than an opportunity for examining another point of view.

He is rather well read, well informed, and debates very well. I wish he would be a little less arrogant in his responses. There are other intelligent people here with valid opinions that might not exactly coincide with his views.

Slightly less strident responses could actually strengthen some of Jim's responses IMHO. Actually, I tend to agree on many points that he expresses. At any rate, I'm happy to see some spirited discussion at MW.

I sometimes wonder if Jim has ever read the Declaration of Independence? Some would see it as a seditious document.

Rev