

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
![]() The 'black box' technology only registers the speed, braking effort, etc when the airbag(s) are deployed, as in an accident. It does not constantly register your speed. While some rental car companies can track your speed and position, it's highly unpopular. I seriously doubt the majority of American drivers will simply roll over quietly and allow this kind of constant-tracking technology to become standard on every vehicle sold (the buyer will be paying for it in higher sticker prices). We've lived without it up to now, accident rates are steadily dropping and there is no demand or real need for a constant-tracking device on every vehicle sold. The current airbag-deployment-triggered devices are more than enough. Going further to track drivers movements, speed, etc will just harrass and really piss off the driving public. Especially me.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner 1990 - 2005 Last edited by Mr 5 0; 12-06-2004 at 03:42 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Pigeon Forge Tn
Posts: 611
|
![]() I agree with the point that currently these "black boxes" that are not in constant operation, can be useful for accident analysis. In that role I would actually agree that they are a good idea.
But once they become more commonplace, it seems natural that they would merge them with the onboard GPS "For a more complete picture...of the accident". (Again, maybe good intentions) From there, the information that was being tracked could easily come into the possesion of interested third parties. (Corporate psychology: they have information that is currently not of use to them, i.e. you havent been in an accident. Its just sitting there doing nothing, why not find a use for it and make some profit?) The thing about it is that it could work its way out there without the average consumer knowing just due lack of public awareness/interest. Unless 60 minutes etc. makes note of it, only the "car folks" will be aware and worried. Especially if the mfrs. take the initative, and spin it as a new safety feature. This just strikes me as one of those things that 5 years down the line people will start to get pissed at, but by then its too late. "Whaddya mean I speed too much!" Sorry, /rant J
__________________
____________ '66 Mustang Coupe- AKA "Lenore" *on disability for a (long) bit* '93 GT Mostly stock AKA "Fawkes" Rice Haters Club Member #239 "I find your lack of faith...disturbing." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." H. L. Mencken |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rare Mustangs....Got One? | 1969Mach1 | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 09-25-2010 04:59 AM |
Msd 2 Step | bottlebaby91 | Windsor Power | 4 | 07-14-2003 08:34 PM |
step by step 99DOHC into a 97GT?! | LX XLR8R | Modular Madness | 0 | 09-23-2002 08:42 AM |
Nitrous Use w/ 2 STEP rpm selector?? | LOBE_50 | Windsor Power | 5 | 02-25-2002 10:24 PM |
1984 T-5. Are they any good??? | tireburner163 | Windsor Power | 9 | 11-15-2001 09:07 AM |