
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
I dynoed 255 RWHP with ported stock heads, stock TB, stock cam, cobra intake and all the bolt ons on the stock 302.
You probably have bigger issues than the TB and MAM.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
You might be right!
I cant figure out what else could be causing it, the engine starts dropping HP drastically. The tuner said he thought the MAM, TB, GT-40 Irons and Cobra upper and lower were to restrictive for the extra cubes. I had always read that the aforementioned parts were good to atleast 5600 RPM even with the extra stroke. I figured they would be a limiting factor but not to that extent. Can anybody think of anything I might have missed. The springs were new and good to .600 lift. It has #24lb injectors so it's not starving for fuel. The E-Cam, heads, TB & MAM sizes work well together and should make peak at 5600 on a 5.0. I have seen and read about stock long block 94-95 Cobra's with similar set ups (Cam, Exhaust,GT-40's 3 angle & Surfaced) getting better numbers. I did not expect over 300 RWHP but thought the extra stoke and slightly higher CR would net around 270-290 RWHP and 310-325 RWTQ. ![]()
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Undescribable
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Ft Myers Fla
Posts: 1,539
|
331 engine with parts that are better suited to a 302. i would think torque would have been a lil better due to the engine size.
__________________
Rice Haters Club Member #101 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
Cars running the cobra ecu almost never dyno well.
I would expect to put out over 350RWHP with my top end on a 331. What was your AFR.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ride Hard
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
|
I think the torque should be higher. What about your timing and ignition?
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
Timing was set at 10 degrees so the tuner could do what he wanted with it via the chip. The AFR was 13.9 according to the print off.
My post initial post is unclear, prior to 5100 RPM's the torque line was pretty flat and the HP was heading up. At 5100 RPM's the HP did not flatten out and then drop it just drastically dropped. No plataue (sp) justa rapid spike downward like it was missing fuel or air. The rapid drop with no plataue (sp) is what confuses me. I put in a new fuel filter today and cleaned the dirty element in the MAM. I'am going to check fuel delivery first via checking the injectors. Then I'll address the air by getting a new MAM, TB and hopefully porting the lower. Then the stock ignition will be addressed. What other things could cause such a rapid HP decline at high RPM's? I would think a need for more air would still plataue (sp) prior to falling off would that be correct?
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
Quote:
Can you post up the hp/AF curve?
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Moline Il
Posts: 901
|
The tuner should be able to get around the limitations of the stock computer with no problems. Heres the picture of the printout that Fox-4-Cobra emailed me. The place he dynoed at wouldnt send him the whole file.
The only thing that stands out to me is that the numbers are low. It looks like its holding the power pretty decent before he stopped the pull. You cant tell exactly what the air-fuel is, but it looks like its in the 13.5 range. With flat-tops and 93 octane, 28 degrees is about all those chambers want for timing. I dont think thats the problem. I'd really like to know exactly what the injectors were doing. From there I'd look at valvetrain geometry. Also, what spark plugs are you running? The next time you go back to the dyno, take a 3.5" floppy and tell them you want the files saved to it, otherwise you will go elsewhere. Andy
__________________
88 coupe 91 LX NMRA Pure Street 5120 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stingy Dyno? | SleeperGT | Modular Madness | 4 | 10-22-2003 01:42 PM |
| My latest dyno adventures | XR1stang | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 08-01-2003 04:00 PM |
| Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
| Best shift points from dyno graph? | 302 LX Eric | Windsor Power | 20 | 06-29-2001 02:15 PM |
| Very disappointed with my 347 dyno! | 8850 | Windsor Power | 32 | 01-12-2001 12:41 PM |
