

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() oh yeah, PM me if you'd be interested in purchasing a used pro-M 80mm MAM calibrated for 24lb injectors, for cheap
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() The cobra intake and mam and 65mm TB will support way more HP than what you are making. Roughly about 425 FWHP.
The heads are the bottleneck. I know people with the GT-40 intake on 351 based engines making over 400RWHP through a 65mm TB. There are a number of things it could be. Maybe the cam is a tooth off??? I doubt it but you never know. I am not sure about the 94-95 cobras but the 93 cobras have a mass air sensor calibrated for 19# injectors even though it has 24#er's the ecu makes up the difference. So be careful buying a MAM calibrated for 24# injectors.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() I dont have a scanner so I cant post the sheet they gave me. I appreciate the offer on the Pro-M unfortunately one is already on the way ordered two days ago.
![]() Dark5.0 The cam was installed straight up dont think that's the problem. The stock TB was 60mm and was replaced today with a 65mm. I will reuse the stock electronics on the new MAM. 94-95's are like the 93's the MAM is for 19's and the j4j1 modifies it for the 24's. I figured the heads would be a bottleneck but did not figure they would hurt me that much. I cant afford new ones right now but will get some next year when the motor is still low mileage. Thanks for the input guys it has been a great help. I'll post the new numbers after getting her back to the Dyno and the chip retuned. ![]()
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stingy Dyno? | SleeperGT | Modular Madness | 4 | 10-22-2003 01:42 PM |
My latest dyno adventures | XR1stang | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 08-01-2003 04:00 PM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Best shift points from dyno graph? | 302 LX Eric | Windsor Power | 20 | 06-29-2001 02:15 PM |
Very disappointed with my 347 dyno! | 8850 | Windsor Power | 32 | 01-12-2001 12:41 PM |