

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: sherwood Forest
Posts: 291
|
![]() man i dont know about the electronics, but you will have to boost refrence the fuel pressure reg no matter what.
__________________
84 gt350 89 lx vert 92 lincoln lsc. All Forced ( one way or another) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
|
![]() Quote:
I'm just worried about the load value change from using the stock transfer function with a larger MAF. Ignition timing might get a bit high, but I just dont know to what extent. After market MAF manufatures have been selling larger MAF's with larger injectors for year's, if it work's on the stang I dont see any problems with it working on a Escort. Could the added ignition timing be tolerated with forced induction if the compression ratio was dropped? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
|
![]() Hey Jeff, this is Josh_LX from FEOA. And Jeff, dont be so modest... Guys, this is the guy with the 262 ft-lb sleeper
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
|
![]() Quote:
These guy's are used to seeing larger numbers from a stock Mustang then what my little 1.9'er can do. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
|
![]() I know, but if you were to take those numbers, divide by 1.9 and multiply by 5.0 liters, it would be 690 wheel lb-ft...
Its all relative, and your still my hero Jeff ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|