

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
cranky old man
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Longview Texas
Posts: 683
|
![]() Quote:
There is no question however that the MPG vs HP ratio has vastly improved in the last few years, and it's all about efficiency. The combustion chambers have been designed to burn fuel more efficiently, the fuel/air charge is metered more precicely, there is less friction, everything is lighter, there is a crapper load of little things they have done that all adds up to better fuel economy for the HP produced. The car factories all have huge Engineering staffs working on that stuff all the time. I don't think you can pin it down to any one or two things, it's a combination of lots of things. Rod
__________________
Under Construction: 64 Falcon 372 cu in. stroker 1:72 rod ratio 6.250" rods (long rod), Comp Cams XE274 230/236 520/526 @ .050, Scorpion Rollers, Roush 200 irons, 10:1 Keith Blacks, Hedman long tubes, 750 Holley DP, Edelbrock Victor Jr., C4 3500 stall, gears and tires to be anounced. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Gimme a Drink!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 694
|
![]() Quote:
I may be off your original question though. Do you have a specific stang your looking to get better MPG with? need more info
__________________
1990 GT,stock T-5,K&N w/o air silencer,March underdrives,FMS wires,timing@14*,PA Perf 130amp alt,Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter,Steeda adj quadrant/clutch cable/firewall adj,Centerforce II clutch,o/r x-pipe,Magnaflow SS catback,g-load brace, subframes,Bilstein struts/shocks,Autometer gauges, 136k and running strong! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Comox, BC, Canada
Posts: 119
|
![]() Well, I don't have a stang, I've got a truck with the 302. And down the line I'm looking at having heads/cam/intake/exhaust but I was wondering if it's too much to hope for that a good combination can retain decent mileage with 'light driving'. I get about 15-17mpg city 20 highway. Is it too much to hope that I can keep it like that? With more power available and torque won't the engine have an easier time of it anyway?
Also the o2 sensor, will it hurt mileage to use long-tube headers? Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
As for the oxygen sensor...the header company might be able to help you on where to tap into the header, or the exhaust tubing and thread in the O2 sensor. I'm pretty sure as long as it's within 18" from the exit of one of the headers...you're truck's (or car) computer can still adjust accordingly. I'd do some research with header companies first. Look into the reputable ones and talk to their techline...if they have one. Last edited by Simi Stang; 05-12-2005 at 06:30 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please Comment of Speed Secret # 2 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 20 | 11-06-2002 11:44 AM |
Damn Car, Good Mileage | Skyman | Blue Oval Lounge | 11 | 09-18-2002 09:38 AM |
86 GT Wondering good performance? | Back Seat Driver | Blue Oval Lounge | 14 | 11-06-2001 01:59 PM |
JD's Performance they any good?? | Stang Runner | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-02-2001 05:41 PM |
Good Performance shops in NW Illinois | redbird | Modular Madness | 0 | 02-27-2001 10:30 AM |