

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 8
|
![]() So i'd be better with the Air Gap RPM intake if i want to get a better torque/power curve. It's right on the RPM range i wanted. The Air gap on my 302 was perfect with those head.
Do i need to change the edelbrook valve spings and convert to stud type roller rocker if i want change for a bigger cam or can i keep the pedestal mount 1.6 roller rocker i have on my 302. I have a goal of 450Hp and 450 Ft-lbs Torque and low 11sec at track. I will need better Transmision with that kind of power ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 8
|
![]() For the compression ratio, i get 11.33 with a 9.503 deck, 60cc chamber and a .041 tick gasket.
Should i mill down the deck and get dish pistons to maximise quench? What compression ratio should id stay to run on pump gaz ? Tanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Head Gasket | tarmon8r | Windsor Power | 1 | 04-15-2005 07:15 PM |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |
what head ? | faststang90 | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-08-2002 07:17 PM |