
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#3 |
|
Huh? Whatcha said?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,073
|
Too many variables to answer that one. It all depends on what you want. The 1.7's and 1.6's are fine. Eitherway you should be fine. It's all a matter of opinion. Never bought anything that important used, not that it's a bad idea, just haven't done that. Ford =Ford, Chevy=Chevy stick with that and you are golden.
The heads can be converted to the stud mount rockers, but why pay more for the same thing with the pedestal mount?
__________________
2003 GT White---STOLEN May you burn in hell whoever took it. Dumbazz didn't even get the good engine that was in the garage. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dont use 1.7 rockers with stock heads? | Coupe5oh | Windsor Power | 10 | 11-28-2015 12:36 PM |
| 2005 Ford Mustang JBA Silver Ceramic Coated Headers. GB | OnlineAutorama | Modular Madness | 0 | 07-14-2005 10:27 PM |
| F Cam With Stock Rockers Or E Cam With 1.72 Roller Rockers ? | 83GTMUSTANG | Windsor Power | 0 | 05-12-2005 12:12 PM |
| Rail Rockers on 289 Small Block Heads | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 16 | 05-11-2003 11:34 PM |
| Anyone have problems with MAC headers?? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 15 | 05-30-2002 08:30 AM |
