

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
![]() I'm in the process of installing a 347 in my Cougar.
The cam I bought is a Crane #449601 It is a Hyd. Roller. My engine is 10.5 cr, Canfield heads [ported], Hooker long tube headers and dual AFB's [500's]. Cam specs are: Intake @ valve 542 Exhaust@valve 563 At .050 Intake opens 5 BTDC Intake closes 39 ABDC Max lift 107 Duration 224 Exhaust opens 53 BBDC Exhaust closes (1) BRDC Max lift 117 Duration 232
__________________
"Support our Troops" Dave 1968 Cougar 2004 Thunderbird 2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew 1986 LTD 1997 Ranger 1992 Honda Civic |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
CAR9FAN
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: m.d
Posts: 103
|
![]() Thanks for that info i been looking in on the roller set up seem like they make good HP but they are a little high on the price! Thanks Car9fan
__________________
MY HOME PAGE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
CAR9FAN
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: m.d
Posts: 103
|
![]() I think iam going to go with a soild lift cam for the 347 hows 248@50 dur. and 560 lift and a 108 lobe sep. sound to you? Thanks, CAR9FAN
__________________
MY HOME PAGE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
![]() Quote:
Duration is kinda low, but that could be due to the 108 LSA. Other than that, sounds GOOD to me! But with those numbers, the car is gonna "sound" like azz until about 3,000 RPM! ![]() Only caution I'm gonna give you on a solid cam. Learn the RIGHT way to set valve lash, get used to it, get good at it, do it often!!! And you'll have NOOOOOO problems with it!
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
CAR9FAN
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: m.d
Posts: 103
|
![]() Thanks for that info, the cam part #31-335-4 COMP CAMS Iam concerned about piston to valve clearance, Here are the pistons that iam useing, 6.5cc/Flat Top
Effective Head Volume: 6.5cc. with my 60 cc Edelbrock RPM HEADS Its going to be 10.5.1 Comp. With that cam do you think i will have any Piston to valve clearance? I would hate to have to buy it put it in cgeck it and send it back, Thanks CAR9FAN
__________________
MY HOME PAGE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Domestic Rice really sucks!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
|
![]() You are aware that the cam you have listed has the old 302 firing order in it, right? Any comp cam with the prefix #31 has this firing order. Just in case, the old firing order is 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8. The H.O. firing order is 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8. Any comp cam with the prefix #35 has this firing order.
Your cam I don't think you will have trouble with clearance. What size valves? 2.02/1.60?
__________________
The sig says it all. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Building a stroker motor | Mustang_289 | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-17-2005 12:46 PM |
Blown Stroker Computer Help | RabidPony | Modular Madness | 10 | 02-07-2004 11:56 PM |
'super' stroker vs 'budget' stroker | mike5p01 | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-11-2003 10:11 PM |
Decided to build a stroker, but where do I start? | WhiteLX | Windsor Power | 5 | 12-16-2002 10:35 AM |
stroker engine question | 82 GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 06-08-2001 03:22 PM |