

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SanAntonio, Tx
Posts: 957
|
![]() I saw in another thread, some guy said it can slightly increase dur, but i can not back that up at all.
either way i like my 1.7's, but on a built stroker, id go for 1.6's just for reliability purposes, less stress i guess you can say.
__________________
X-Texas highway patrol ssp 1990 coupe - exploder Gt-40 iron heads, Explorer intake, 19 lber's. E-cam. crane 1.7 rollers. 190fp. 75mm maf. 65mm tb, tubular subframe connectors, mac cai, Asp crank pulley, T-5, king cobra clutch, flowtech 1-5/8 unequals, mac X-pipe Frpp driveshaft, lakewood Lca's. race weight 3,160 12.69 @ 107.35, 1.71 60' 26x8.5 drag's 3.90 gear 13.20 @ 106.91 - 235/60/15 firestones 2.3 60' 3.27 gear |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dont use 1.7 rockers with stock heads? | Coupe5oh | Windsor Power | 10 | 11-28-2015 12:36 PM |
F Cam With Stock Rockers Or E Cam With 1.72 Roller Rockers ? | 83GTMUSTANG | Windsor Power | 0 | 05-12-2005 12:12 PM |
Rail Rockers on 289 Small Block Heads | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 16 | 05-11-2003 11:34 PM |
Roller Rockers, bad? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 04-14-2002 01:35 PM |
reg rockers or roller rockers?? | Chevysucks | Windsor Power | 1 | 12-05-2001 08:17 PM |