

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
![]() 1.7's will give you more lift. But NOT more duration.
Take the LOBE lift spec of the cam, multiply it by 1.6, that'll be your advertised lift with the 1.6 rockers. muliply lobe lift by 1.7, you guessed it, advertised lift with the 1.7's. I have a set of 1.7's on my 347, and have had ZERO problems. Stud girdle might be a good idea though. ![]()
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
CAR9FAN
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: m.d
Posts: 103
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
MY HOME PAGE |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dont use 1.7 rockers with stock heads? | Coupe5oh | Windsor Power | 10 | 11-28-2015 12:36 PM |
F Cam With Stock Rockers Or E Cam With 1.72 Roller Rockers ? | 83GTMUSTANG | Windsor Power | 0 | 05-12-2005 12:12 PM |
Rail Rockers on 289 Small Block Heads | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 16 | 05-11-2003 11:34 PM |
Roller Rockers, bad? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 04-14-2002 01:35 PM |
reg rockers or roller rockers?? | Chevysucks | Windsor Power | 1 | 12-05-2001 08:17 PM |