

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ride Hard
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
|
![]() The numbers you are looking for are not far off if you are judging at the flywheel. If you want the 302, swap a 302 block in and put all the 289 front accesories on it. Then nobody can tell if you have a 289 or 302.
If you started off with a 5.0 engine, the heads are better then the older ones and the engine would have the roller cam right from the factory. I am a bit partial to this conversion....cause I have done it to mine ![]() Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Knuckle-Basher
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 249
|
![]() Hmmm...I'm definately keeping the original 289 block unless, god forbid, it's cracked or something. But I doubt that very much.
If I can keep the stock heads and just have them worked on AND get 300hp at the flywheel along with the other upgrades, that would be good enough for me. I don't plan on racing, I'm scared to death of damaging this car since I restored it and it's in such great shape. I just figure why not beef it up a bit since I'm itching to rebuild it anyway. (I think it's fun. I was raised on Legos, what can I say...) Also, I know some people at work that have run C4s just like mine that have stood up to just over 300 horses and haven't run into any problems over the years. I might actually be leaning towards this simply because I wouldn't have to change my transmission and differential. I don't have a whole lot of money to throw around, I'm a college student, after all. ![]() On a different note, I've heard I can get 4 speed autos from Ford that look exactly or almost exactly like the old C4s. Are these the transmissions in the old 5.0s? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ride Hard
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
|
![]() I would assume the transmission you are referring to is the Ford AOD. A bit bigger transmission, with a bigger oil pan. yes it came in the old 5.0's, I put one of those in my car too.
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1968 engine numbers, 289 or 302? | andybud | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 09-11-2003 12:14 PM |
raced a Supra Twin Turbo | Stang35th | Stang Stories | 63 | 08-23-2003 12:36 AM |
Rebuilt Engine Problems | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 05-08-2003 10:19 AM |
Engine rebuilding advice | starrparker | Classic Mustangs | 7 | 08-26-2001 06:21 PM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Racer's Club House | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |