Hybrid Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
05-17-2006, 10:32 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
Re: which 351W?
If I was building the 408, 351 I would have a roller cam. It makes MUCH more power and has less resistance.
The cam events can be more agressive and get the valves open and closed quickly. Well worth the money, IMHOP
__________________
"Support our Troops" Dave 1968 Cougar 2004 Thunderbird 2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew 1986 LTD 1997 Ranger 1992 Honda Civic |
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 07:53 AM
|
#2 |
|
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: which 351W?
You don't HAVE to have a roller block to run a roller cam. Aftermarket stuff works very well in a non-roller block. Just can't run a factory type roller cam. Non-roller blocks have shorter lifter bores, and nowhere to mount the "spider".
www.cammotion.com Kip will fix you up. My "Mr Nasty" cam is a roller, and I've had ZERO problems with it in a non-roller block.
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... 
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EFI 351W How fast should it go? | 89fast5oh | Windsor Power | 9 | 11-25-2003 03:28 PM |
| 351W Heads on a 87 302 Block | NitroNixon | Windsor Power | 5 | 05-08-2003 09:29 PM |
| 351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
| 351W EFI in a Fox? | Big-T | Windsor Power | 4 | 12-02-2002 09:43 AM |
| 351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |