

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#11 |
Knuckle-Basher
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 249
|
![]() Hmmm...that's another thing I have to consider, not getting too much "head" (GT40-X) for what I want to do with the engine. But wouldn't AFR or TFTW heads fall into that category, too?
I'm kinda leaning towards the TFTW heads right now, since I'd like to keep the original valve covers and be extra sneaky. ![]()
__________________
Matt's '65 Coupe http://s178.photobucket.com/albums/w277/deltamustang65/ If Nissan Motorsports = NISMO, wouldn't Honda Motorsports = HOMO? |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which Iron Heads & Intake? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 7 | 01-17-2009 05:44 PM |
AFR 165's or other heads with cam and stock induction | Mustang_GT_90 | Windsor Power | 27 | 11-25-2002 03:01 PM |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
is there a visual diff. between the stock e7 and gt 40 iron heads | 93calcobra | Windsor Power | 3 | 11-05-2002 09:58 AM |
will 99-2002 cams out of the pi heads fit in the 96-98 stock heads | slow98 | Modular Madness | 6 | 10-25-2002 04:28 PM |