

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
![]() You've got the right idea.
I'd like to know your vacuum at idle, in Park. It would be really nice to know what your vacuum is when you feel you're losing your top end power, too. I'm guessing it's between 7" & 8". Either way, an 8.5 PV will suit your set up better than a 6.5 PV will. May not solve all your problems, but it's a step in the right direction. Throttle response has nothing to do with vacuum or mechanical secondaries, it's in how the accelerator pump is set up, the idle mixture, and the throttle plates. The reason your car should do better with a 3310 is vehicle weight and an auto tranny. That combo is difficult to tune mechanical secondaries for, whereas vacuum secondaries are tuned by engine demand. You just fine tune them with jets and the secondary spring. Are you experiencing a bog, or it just feels like the carb runs out of juice way too soon? If it's the later, a 3310, properly set up, should solve it. In the mean time, an 8.5 PV will help.
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
![]() Don't forget that most people think of the power valve "rating" BACKWARDS!!! If you have a 6.5 PV, it's open BELOW 6.5 hg.
Above that, it's as tight as an ugly 4th grader! And back to the original question: NO, it can't be that simple. It never is! ![]()
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
![]() Quote:
Correct, which also means as you're getting into your top end, and the vacuum is rising again, a 6.5 PV will close up sooner. That's why I feel pretty confident about suggesting an 8.5 PV. ![]()
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Import Slayer
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator. Last edited by 82 GT; 09-25-2006 at 11:37 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Import Slayer
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
|
![]() I ordered the new 8.5pv today along with a set of 74 jets for the front. If the 74's are too rich, then it's still ok 'cause I can use them next year when I finally hook up my nitrous. I'll need to jet up for that anyway.
PKRWUD, the 15hg I have at idle IS when it's in park.
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simple "jacking up" question- | 1jimmy__d | Windsor Power | 1 | 02-20-2003 10:35 PM |
simple question | Lonzo | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 09-10-2002 09:37 AM |
which fuse to wire a simple neon? | member02 | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 05-10-2002 04:12 PM |
Simple, Simple question regarding harmonic balancers | 66signalflare | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 04-04-2001 10:53 PM |
Simple question | mike_89gt | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 06-28-1999 09:33 AM |