
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm in the US so i don't know the metric to english conversion, but i got poor mileage when i had a 5 speed 2.3L mustang ('91). I actually get close to similar mileage with my '84 5.0L carbureted mustang (difference of about 3 miles per gallon less and 100 horsepower and 140 lb/ft of torque more with the 5.0L). I tried the same thing and was dissapointed with the gas mileage of my mustang when i had it because it was gutless and got poor mileage. Getting a new oxygen sensor may help but don't expect any miracles, it sounds like you're getting typical mileage with yours.
------------------ '84 Mustang 5.0 LX My car |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| oxygen sensor | djbow | Small Ponies | 3 | 03-21-2004 07:52 PM |
| oxygen sensor contamination | 93GTDIN | Windsor Power | 1 | 02-16-2003 01:58 PM |
| Whats the best way to tell if your running lean or rich? | K.C. 5.0 | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-10-2001 03:04 PM |
| OXYGEN SENSOR | JK88GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-16-2001 06:00 PM |
| Temp sensor question | RB92GT | Windsor Power | 2 | 06-23-2001 12:23 PM |
