

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() 289/302/351W are all very similar. You can get probably almost the same hp numbers out of all of them. On the dyno 289/302 would probably be almost identical with the same heads/cam etc. When the 302 came out in 68, it had little or no power advantage over the 289. The 351W does have a displacement advantage that adds some torque and lets you get the same or more power at lower RPM's.
Displacemet makes a difference, but just because I have a 351W it does not mean that I will beat every 289 stang that I see. ------------------ 67 Fastback - Arctic White Pearl paint 351W 415 hp, Trick Flow Alum. Heads, C-4 Trans, 3.55 gears, Front Disc Brakes, 1-1/8" Fr. 3/4" rear sway bars. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rare Mustangs....Got One? | 1969Mach1 | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 09-25-2010 04:59 AM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:43 AM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Racer's Club House | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |