

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: CA, US
Posts: 113
|
![]() Ok... don't go to 351 heads; bigger combustion chambers and therefore, less power than if you just pocket ported and put larger valves on your original heads... trust me, these work well. Since you went with the performer stuff, i would recommend this for the best mid range performance. I'm sorta an expert in 289 edelbrock performer stuff... my engine pulls farther than 5500rpm as described in the performer kit, but i'm using a holley and shelby intake. Look into it, bigger isn't always better
------------------ '63 Merc Meteor hardtop, warm 302, C4 auto, 2.25" Flowmaster Exhaust, '65 289 heads - ported/chevy valves, performer cam, edelbrock f4a intake, full length hookers, 600 holley, roller rockers, k'n, 10.5:1 hyperutetic pistons... mid 13's hoping to reach into 12's |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2 types of GT40 iron heads, not talking abou the P | Hethj7 | Windsor Power | 5 | 10-26-2010 09:16 PM |
Heads heads and more heads... | OneBad91 | Windsor Power | 13 | 12-16-2003 12:04 AM |
is there a visual diff. between the stock e7 and gt 40 iron heads | 93calcobra | Windsor Power | 3 | 11-05-2002 09:58 AM |
World iron heads big problem help please!! | 92Rustang | Windsor Power | 3 | 07-21-2001 11:40 PM |
Problem with good set Iron Heads | GTGeorge | Windsor Power | 2 | 05-04-2001 12:39 PM |