

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() A proper tune on a non load bearing equipped dynojet should include a max hp run, and an all gear run.
When this is done different loads are placed on the engine, significant enough to show a loss in hp associated with pinging, or unmask the supposed masked pinging. For example, a 3rd gear dyno pull on it's own should be identical to the 3rd gear run in the all gear, and the car should not detonate or ping when in 4th gear. How in depth is the EPA load information? The difference in any given 1987-1993 model year 5.0 between stripped 5spd coupe, and auto aod vert could easily be 300 lbs. A difference of 10% If a person has problems with detonating and pinging and continues to blow head gaskets, maybe they should think about a different tuner, not a different dyno. Also, if it REALLY bothers you that much, you can order the load bearing attachment, the air fuel ratio monitor, and the rpm pickup for the Dynojet for a grand total of $4550, or the load bearing attachment for $1500 stand alone. I've seen the results of a Mustang Dyno tune. 330rwhp and a 107mph trap ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stingy Dyno? | SleeperGT | Modular Madness | 4 | 10-22-2003 01:42 PM |
What is Mustang 1750 dyno? | Mike_W | Windsor Power | 2 | 07-13-2001 09:57 AM |
Dynojet or Mustang Dyno? | Noongs94GT | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-22-2001 08:02 PM |
Dyno Don '66 Mustang photos? | jibusuki | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 08-13-2000 06:41 PM |