

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() LOL.
The second post by me was the more accurate of the two. I find it extremely difficult to put the 64 1/2 260 V-8 in as a Muscle Car. Even the 289 and 289hipo's. The older 302's as well. They weren't brutish enough. The Mustang II was a lot more than what it gets credit for. Placing it into the Muscle Car category, even with the 302 is too hard for me to do though. They are too close to sporty. Can any one here name the ONLY year the V-8 was not an option in the Mustang? For a bonus, name the two possible engines that year. For even more points, what was the top performance model, and the output of the engine? LOL... If you don't know, it'll make you sick. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
South Florida Ford VS Chevy Dyno Day!! | SpeedInjected | Ford Show & Go | 0 | 11-08-2003 12:47 AM |
South Florida Ford VS Chevy Dyno Day!! | SpeedInjected | Blue Oval Lounge | 0 | 11-08-2003 12:41 AM |
Lets do a ford vs chevy meet/cruise to carlsbad on sept. 14th | 46stang | Ford Show & Go | 10 | 08-12-2002 11:43 PM |
Ford questions from a Chevy guy | MuscleCarFanatic | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 06-04-2001 03:24 AM |