MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-12-2001, 07:31 PM   #6
fiveohpatrol
I'd rather be basketweaving
 
fiveohpatrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
Post

I have owned 2 92 rangers and neither gave me a single problem, one was a 4.0L and the other was a 3.0L v6, the 4.0 had aLOT more power than the 3.0, both had well over 140K miles and didnt burn a drop of oil
both were 2wd so i cant shed any light on the 4x4 system, but even with 2wd and about 400lbs in the back they handle great in the snow
i take it back, i did have one problem with my most recent 92, theres a bracket on the right front framerail that holds the top of the shock and spring, it had rusted out and cracked, so thats one thing to look for, thats it though
i've heard good things about the S-10's 4.3L v6, but also heard bad things about the 2.5L 4cyl
why dont you buy a 90-92 ranger and drop a blown 347? tell me that wouldnt be fun

------------------
88 Notch, B&M Ripper, 3.73's, Ported E7's, Explorer int. w/ ported lower, pulleys, 1.7RR's, BBK headers, off-road H-pipe, flowmasters, subframes, 65mm TB, March ram air ,MSD coil, U/L control arms, 155lph f/p, Crane Adj.FPR, Nitto drag radials, best 1/4--> 13.76@101.4 on a 2.17 60ft
fiveohpatrol is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


SEARCH