

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 1,526
|
![]() Quote:
Yeah, with NOS or a blower you want to reduce back preasure pretty much as much as possible. (Ummm, yeah, that actually makes sense ![]() But an X-pipe with straight though baffled (as aposed to chambered) mufflers work well. I have Dynomax Ultra-Flows with a Bassani X-pipe myself. But in short, opening the exhaulst will be worth while with a NOS'd car. As far as the emissions testing. Around here they do a look and see if you have something that looks like a cat. In CA, I believe they do the OEM rule. Meaning its gotta be an OEM part or an approved aftermarket. The only approved aftermarket Mustang parts I know of are part of the GT40 program isn't any help at all here. Its really stupid, because a Bassani catalitic x-pipe will typically do better then the OEM H-pipe on a sniffer test, but its still illegal. In catalogs there will always be an * and a foot note next to them. In conclusion, NA, a X-pipe with cats is worth maybe 12 rwhp. With NOS somewhat more. An off-road pipe will work somewhat better. Also remember, its not that hard to swap the H (or X pipe) in and out for inspection once a year. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
X vs H Pipes | Jason1320 | Modular Madness | 2 | 02-28-2004 08:16 PM |
How big are the stock tail pipes and how restrictive are they? | 96_4.6 | Modular Madness | 4 | 12-09-2003 07:41 PM |
Will 99+stang tail pipes fit 96-98?? | 96_4.6 | Modular Madness | 3 | 09-19-2002 05:50 PM |
turn-down pipes TORQUE IS GONE!!! | FordFasteR | Windsor Power | 13 | 04-19-2002 07:10 AM |
are mac's 3 1/2 inch tail pipes for my setup | Chevysucks | Windsor Power | 1 | 03-18-2002 03:46 PM |