
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wichita,KS
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
My personal theory is that Ford just didn't want to re-engineer the T-bird engine line just to put the old style intake on the SN-95 motors. There is more than enough room for the earlier style intake and throttle bodies in the 94-95 bodies. If you want to put different valve covers on the 94-95 engines you will have to put a spacer under the upper because of the location of the TB. Probably run into hood clearance problems then. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Explore intake??????????? | William Bowers | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-14-2002 10:27 PM |
| HELP!!! oil in intake, what to do?? | bosco | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-03-2002 05:02 PM |
| Edelbrock spec's and intake question?? | jerryIII | Windsor Power | 0 | 05-24-2001 12:49 PM |
| OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' | QUIN | Windsor Power | 8 | 03-09-2001 01:58 PM |
| Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |
