MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-13-2001, 06:46 PM   #5
blue00gt
Mustang Addict
 
blue00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
Post

Given the powerband of the Performer intake and the cam that car 2 will have, I agree that 2.02's are probably too big of a valve - seems like a mismatched combo that probably wouldn't make impressive power on low or top end. Should either go with 1.94's or a more agressive cam and intake...
blue00gt is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
faster times 91redgt Windsor Power 2 10-26-2002 01:55 PM
which is faster? foxbodied Stang Stories 9 07-29-2002 12:53 AM
Trying to get the car to be faster on the motor! NOSstang08690 Modular Madness 6 03-24-2002 04:01 PM
what is faster stock 4.6 dohc cobra or 351w aonick Windsor Power 5 08-21-2001 03:42 AM
Are '98 GTs any faster than '96-'97s? Daniel MItchell Modular Madness 6 03-29-2000 03:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.


SEARCH