Ls1 in a Mustang???

Unit 5302 · 11-20-2001, 08:10 PM

I didn't read 1LOSERSS's last Mustang hatin' post. It just looked too messy to me. It hurt my eyes. LOL, he's so fuckin stupid it hurts.

Maybe if I'd been to the track 3000 times instead of seeing 3000 posts relating to the time of the cars I would have better knowledge?

Yawn... Your arguments have no merit, no logic, and no intellegence behind them. They never have, they never will. I think you are truly what people make fun of when they say "Okie," 1BADCAR. Therefore, I shall refer to you as "Okieboy"A few of you give the whole state's population a bad name. Hey, at least you can proof read for spelling errors, though. Hehehe.

With suspension and the rest, 220rwhp will put you in the 12's, I see no reason why 300rwhp can't go low 12's. Trouble is, the LS1 doesn't have 300rwhp stock. More like 280-290. But if you'd like to listen to Okieboy, it does. Oh wait, kinda stock. Well, if you add just a whisper lid, some exhaust, maybe a set of headers, you know the basics. The same basics that boost to the tune of 30hp. That's like saying a stock fox 5.0 has 200rwhp+. LOL. Uh-huh. It's always good just to round up to a nice number when you don't really have it.

Here. Let me spell it out for you, Okieboy. Mustang = same 60ft times stock as well driven LS1. Now take the rwhp of an LS1, that has 600lbs more weight and wider tires and stick it into a fox. Do you see a problem with that? Appearently not, 'cause you're stupid. I'll give you a hint, though. You'll be running 2.5s in the 60ft and spinning all the way through 2nd, and partly through 3rd. You're always bitchin about shitty launches. Your launches are not shitty. They are decent for a stock 5.0, get a clue. 2.0 is generally considered a VERY good 60ft for a stock car on street radials in a Mustang.

Mach 1 is dead on about few people wanting it. Take a look at the responses on this thread. Mustang shoppers and fans buy Mustangs, and 80% of us wouldn't want it. 80% = a lot, just in case you're wondering about those big numbers. You don't build a car like that to sell it though.

Okieboy, let me do some math for you. Hang on, don't mean to hurt your brain. Engine = $1000, Tranny = $1000+. Motor mounts or custom K member work, all the rest of the mounting, custom exhaust, driveshaft, linkages, etc will add up to at least $500 worth of parts and work. Now that's at least $2500. If you can't build a solid *** 302 or a 351 for that kinda money, you're doin something wrong.

By the way, you spelled hipocrit wrong, Okieboy, it's hipocrite, dumbass.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs	Mach1 Cobra Jet	Classic Mustangs	20	07-11-2005 08:06 PM
Yellow Mustang Stampede TULSA OK August 17	stylin99	Ford Show & Go	2	11-09-2004 11:19 PM
Myrtle Beach Mustang Week 7/22-28/2002	GreenMachine93	Ford Show & Go	0	06-21-2002 05:59 PM
89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang	Five0	Stang Stories	7	04-01-2001 02:50 AM
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me.	Taqus	Blue Oval Lounge	3	01-17-2001 02:39 AM

11-20-2001, 08:10 PM	#11
Unit 5302 Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 5,246	I didn't read 1LOSERSS's last Mustang hatin' post. It just looked too messy to me. It hurt my eyes. LOL, he's so fuckin stupid it hurts. Maybe if I'd been to the track 3000 times instead of seeing 3000 posts relating to the time of the cars I would have better knowledge? Yawn... Your arguments have no merit, no logic, and no intellegence behind them. They never have, they never will. I think you are truly what people make fun of when they say "Okie," 1BADCAR. Therefore, I shall refer to you as "Okieboy"A few of you give the whole state's population a bad name. Hey, at least you can proof read for spelling errors, though. Hehehe. With suspension and the rest, 220rwhp will put you in the 12's, I see no reason why 300rwhp can't go low 12's. Trouble is, the LS1 doesn't have 300rwhp stock. More like 280-290. But if you'd like to listen to Okieboy, it does. Oh wait, kinda stock. Well, if you add just a whisper lid, some exhaust, maybe a set of headers, you know the basics. The same basics that boost to the tune of 30hp. That's like saying a stock fox 5.0 has 200rwhp+. LOL. Uh-huh. It's always good just to round up to a nice number when you don't really have it. Here. Let me spell it out for you, Okieboy. Mustang = same 60ft times stock as well driven LS1. Now take the rwhp of an LS1, that has 600lbs more weight and wider tires and stick it into a fox. Do you see a problem with that? Appearently not, 'cause you're stupid. I'll give you a hint, though. You'll be running 2.5s in the 60ft and spinning all the way through 2nd, and partly through 3rd. You're always bitchin about shitty launches. Your launches are not shitty. They are decent for a stock 5.0, get a clue. 2.0 is generally considered a VERY good 60ft for a stock car on street radials in a Mustang. Mach 1 is dead on about few people wanting it. Take a look at the responses on this thread. Mustang shoppers and fans buy Mustangs, and 80% of us wouldn't want it. 80% = a lot, just in case you're wondering about those big numbers. You don't build a car like that to sell it though. Okieboy, let me do some math for you. Hang on, don't mean to hurt your brain. Engine = $1000, Tranny = $1000+. Motor mounts or custom K member work, all the rest of the mounting, custom exhaust, driveshaft, linkages, etc will add up to at least $500 worth of parts and work. Now that's at least $2500. If you can't build a solid * 302 or a 351 for that kinda money, you're doin something wrong. By the way, you spelled hipocrit wrong, Okieboy**, it's hipocrite, dumbass.