MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-19-2002, 11:46 PM   #1
ultraflo
NX dealer-man
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 977
Default

12 - respectable
11 - quick
10 - fast
9 - even faster
8 - sick
7 - insane
6 - nutz (cause it takes two big ones to go into that territory)

...ET ranges for a doorslammer, not dragsters (aka rails) or funnycars

11's are fast for plain ol' stock radial treads.... IMHO
__________________
RLS Racing!

93 LX
9.20 @ 147mph

03 Mach 1
12.39 @ 116mph
ultraflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2002, 11:47 PM   #2
DAN-MAN
Confederate Cowboy
 
DAN-MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 546
Default

Quote:
originally posted by this is not cbring
15's = respectable
14's = quick
13's and better = fast
Dude, if anybody's running 15's in the 1/4, then they're more than likely an inexperienced driver or they're driving the fastest import .

14's, any stock mustang gt can accomplish that easy with a good driver.

13's, ok, not fast, but ok

12's or faster, very good and very respectable.

My 2 1/4 cents.

Daniel.
__________________
DAN-MAN

RHC MEMBER #25
DAN-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2002, 01:11 AM   #3
MidNiteBlu 5.0
I got something to say
 
MidNiteBlu 5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,557
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PKRWUD
I've said it before: The only time I ever pissed in my pants was as the passenger in a blown and juiced 427 Vega while doing a 9 second 1/4.

That's fast.

Take care,
~Chris
Hehe i bet that was a hell of a ride. There was a guy with a Vega at the track last night. 400 CI small block Chevy, 1050 dominator, 200 shot of nitrous, ran a 6.6 at 111 in the 1/8 Keep in mind this is at qualcomm which is even shittier traction wise than carlsbad. guy was spinning pretty much 1/4-1/2 way down the track

Later,
Nick
__________________
91 LX Hatch 5.0 - made for the twisties
89 LX Hatchback 5.0 5spd. stolen/stripped 4/7/05
http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?3494
1987 Toyota Pickup
Ricer Haters Club Member #33

Want a custom gauge cluster for your Vintage Mustang?
www.jmeenterprises.com
MidNiteBlu 5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2002, 01:39 AM   #4
Coupe Devil
Moderator
 
Coupe Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,643
Default

Well basically there is a difference in fast and quick.. so 160 + MPH is fast.. no matter how long the distance... as far as quick... a mid 11 is nice. a 10 is better and a 9 or lower is just a dream at this point. You gotta remember, my best 1/8th mile comes out to a 14.2 1/4...

Bradley
__________________
1990 GT, 347, TFS TW Heads, TFS Cam, TFS Track heat, Twin turbos, FMIC, T5.

Built Ford Tough Moderator
Coupe Devil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2002, 12:18 AM   #5
ultraflo
NX dealer-man
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 977
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pony_power_90
Well basically there is a difference in fast and quick..
Bradley
Very good point!

150mph must be considered fast by the sanctioning bodies since vehicles traveling in excess of that mph must have a parachute... right?

A good example is that, out of a pair of cars drag racing, one may be quicker than the other, while the 'slower' car may be faster... factors such as traction, weight, etc. play into the equation then.

Thanks for getting me, and hopefully the others, straightened out on that Bradley
__________________
RLS Racing!

93 LX
9.20 @ 147mph

03 Mach 1
12.39 @ 116mph
ultraflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2002, 08:51 AM   #6
this is not cbring
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 380
Default

why i think 13's are fast............

i just counted the last 50 cars that drove past my window........barring any huge sleepers, i didn't see a single car that looked capable of running 13's...............i saw maybe 4 cars that MIGHT be able to run 14's (audi tt, 94-98 stang gt, new bimmer 3 series, and a pontiac GTP)

sure, i could say that nothing that runs 10's or higher is fast.........but then i may never actually see a "fast" car on the street
__________________
2002 vw gti 1.8T
this is not cbring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2002, 12:11 PM   #7
GONZO99TA
Registered Member
 
GONZO99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ultraflo
12 - respectable
11 - quick
10 - fast
9 - even faster
8 - sick
7 - insane
6 - nutz (cause it takes two big ones to go into that territory)

...ET ranges for a doorslammer, not dragsters (aka rails) or funnycars

11's are fast for plain ol' stock radial treads.... IMHO
i would consider this a pretty good range

there are way too many 13 sec cars running around these days that it just feels normal to me
now if you jump back in time to the mid 80's then 13's would have been something to be proud of as a street car, but these days eh too common.
__________________
99 30th annv. Trans am
79 Trans am black se
GONZO99TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2002, 08:14 PM   #8
84LX89GT
Mustangs
 
84LX89GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
Post

this is not cbring brings up a good point. When i was in high school, someone who had a 15 second car had a "fast car". My friends think my car is "insanely fast", even though 80% of the people on this site have a faster car than i do.

There's a BIG difference in TRACK fast and STREET fast especially when comparing your car against most cars you see on the street. Also, there's a guy at my work that runs slicks and mild mods on his '92 GT and ran a 13.54@99.?mph in great weather launching at 5500 rpm, whereas my GT would probably waste his on the street but my ET/traction-driving sucks.

It's all comparative. i suppose anything that has the potential to run a low 14 and under is fast, 12's very fast, 11's really really fast, 10's nuts, 9's and under insane. 15 and 16 second cars are ok....fast enough to easily merge into traffic, 17 and above are SLOW.
__________________
2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R

1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8
ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain
hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem

1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc.

Sold 02/06/04
1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03)

Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock)
84LX89GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 07:01 PM   #9
86 Grand Marqui
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dover, Delaware...Ft.Pierce, Florida...Hiawassee, Georgia...Las Vegas, Nevada.
Posts: 90
Default

It is all a matter of perception.Down here in South Florida,If you have a vehicle that you can drive at least 50 miles, like to the track, IF you can run at least an 11.5 with NO NOS,you are good to go.However, IF you have BIG MONEY in your car, You better be fast.
86 Grand Marqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 07:56 PM   #10
The Deuce
Registered Member
 
The Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,325
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 86 Grand Marqui
It is all a matter of perception.Down here in South Florida,If you have a vehicle that you can drive at least 50 miles, like to the track, IF you can run at least an 11.5 with NO NOS,you are good to go.However, IF you have BIG MONEY in your car, You better be fast.
WTF? You dig up an old thread and then don't even make sense.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60'
1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.)
1964.5 Mustang 289

Rice Haters Club Member #13
The Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:06 PM   #11
Eric4Nitrous
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 1,122
Default

under 12's is fast to me. 7 seconds is fun. 6's are gonna be even better.
__________________
68 Camaro
Gene Fulton 632ci Two stages of Jug
8.41 164mph Rockingham 1-26-03
Eric4Nitrous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:15 PM   #12
ultraflo
NX dealer-man
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 977
Default

wtf are you talking about Eric!?!?!? Every 6 sec door-slammer car I've ever watched go down the 1320 makes me think to myself "that was INSANE"

...especially the ones that get a little outta shape and still run a 6.xx
__________________
RLS Racing!

93 LX
9.20 @ 147mph

03 Mach 1
12.39 @ 116mph
ultraflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:20 PM   #13
Eric4Nitrous
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 1,122
Default

I hope i can dip into the 6's with this new car. I've wanted it sooo long. I came so close last year but didn't do it. I'm wanting a 6 second slip.
__________________
68 Camaro
Gene Fulton 632ci Two stages of Jug
8.41 164mph Rockingham 1-26-03
Eric4Nitrous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:40 PM   #14
ultraflo
NX dealer-man
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 977
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Eric4Nitrous
I'm wanting a 6 second slip.
Flip that 6 over (9) and I can totally relate... I was a mere .04 seconds away from a single digit ET before the block let go

It was a blast while it lasted, though!
__________________
RLS Racing!

93 LX
9.20 @ 147mph

03 Mach 1
12.39 @ 116mph
ultraflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:44 PM   #15
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ultraflo
It was a blast while it lasted, though!
Sounds like it was a "blast" at the end, too.



Take care,
~Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:51 PM   #16
ultraflo
NX dealer-man
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 977
Default

LOL, it was more of a "POP!!!" than a blast... maybe more like "POOFFFFF!!!" ..er, no, maybe... lol

One thing that blew my mind, is that the rotating assembly, cam, and belt drive all made it through unharmed... although I had to cut the dislodged cam bearings out to remove the cam. Once the block split down the middle, for some reason, the cam bearings didn't want to stay where they're supposed to be

I got lucky... in a strange sort of way, I guess
__________________
RLS Racing!

93 LX
9.20 @ 147mph

03 Mach 1
12.39 @ 116mph
ultraflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 08:54 PM   #17
Eric4Nitrous
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 1,122
Default

Hey Ryan, are you interested in becoming a crew member for me? No joking aside? If you are we can talk out some things. One guy moved back to alabama to be with his family..so he can't help me. And noboby around this area knows what it takes..and isn't dependable.
__________________
68 Camaro
Gene Fulton 632ci Two stages of Jug
8.41 164mph Rockingham 1-26-03
Eric4Nitrous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 09:05 PM   #18
ultraflo
NX dealer-man
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 977
Default

I really would like to Eric, however, I will be going back to work for my dad soon and am unable to make any other commitments at this time... I have no idea what will be asked of me this spring in terms of my job, though I have been guaranteed time off to go racing.

If I were in any position to travel, I would be more than willing to do so... I'll let you know if anything comes up that will allow me to join your efforts.

I sincerely appreciate the offer!
__________________
RLS Racing!

93 LX
9.20 @ 147mph

03 Mach 1
12.39 @ 116mph
ultraflo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 09:14 PM   #19
Eric4Nitrous
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 1,122
Default

no problem. They'll be a spot open for ya. I figured since we got along so good you'd be a good person to have as a crew member.
__________________
68 Camaro
Gene Fulton 632ci Two stages of Jug
8.41 164mph Rockingham 1-26-03
Eric4Nitrous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2002, 09:21 PM   #20
Crazy Horse GT
Registered Member
 
Crazy Horse GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sale Creek, TN. C. S. A.
Posts: 4,652
Default

does this mean i aint the crew chief anymore. lol
__________________
95 gt vert, lot's of stuff, it aint slow.

04 sonic blue v - six my beater
89 rs camaro iroc turbo hood, other stuff, my wifes ride
84 lx stang cammed up 289 hi po, etc
65 falcon, maybe by the year 2020.

black 00gt, gone but never forgotten.

R H C- member # 1
o.b.c. da prez- member # 1 if your under 40 dont ask.
goodbye for now odie,r.i.p. 11-27-03
Crazy Horse GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAST vs. Chip STEEDAJEFF Windsor Power 1 09-29-2002 02:16 PM
new to fast mustangs but not fast cars...I've a few ?'s XGN Windsor Power 3 07-03-2002 09:40 AM
Are these fast?? Dark_5.0 Stang Stories 13 05-16-2002 01:19 PM
Super cars and Fast and the Furious #1 Pony Blue Oval Lounge 9 01-29-2002 12:54 AM
Pesky Supra, actually thought he had a fast car. Unit 5302 Stang Stories 7 03-20-2001 01:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.


SEARCH