MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-22-2001, 02:29 AM   #1
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Cool A Little Perspective on Engine Size

Well, I finally got some pics of parts for my 427. It's a 1963 Ford 427 Low Riser with the Dual Quad intake.

As you can see, the parts are a little larger than the 5.0, LOL.







No comments on the goofy lookin photo of me, this was taken at 2AM on a delay shot, the Camera was sittin on the Capri. Hehe.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2001, 04:56 PM   #2
lx mike
Undescribable
 
lx mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Ft Myers Fla
Posts: 1,539
Post

Quote:
No comments on the goofy lookin photo of me
I wouldn't say it's goofy, more like .......



------------------
93-LX: 5 Speed, Flow's with H-Pipe, 3.73's Sub's and K&N.
lx mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2001, 05:48 PM   #3
jimberg
Registered Member
 
jimberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
Post

Replace that header with a bolt-action rifle and newspaper and we have ourselves Lee Harvey Oswald.

Seriously, though, those are some monster parts.

------------------
351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible
jimberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2001, 08:24 PM   #4
MiracleMax
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
Post

I was thinkng more along the lines of a young and well groomed Charley Manson!

Factory cast iron header? sweet!

IMO I see some serious earning potential
MiracleMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2001, 09:31 PM   #5
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Post

Yeah, those cast iron manifolds are worth between $600-$1000 last time I checked. I plan to put the engine into an late 60's Cougar, or a 69 Mustang. If I do, the manifolds will have to go. They just don't fit in the engine compartment. As you can tell from the photo's, that's a loooong ways off.

I'm not sure I'll be able to run the heads either. At 11.1:1 compression, they were best suited to leaded only, super premium gas when it was availible. Octane booster, and lead additive will need to be in the gas to avoid detonation I think.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 02:50 AM   #6
1BAD89
Tubbed and Juiced
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,861
Post

That is a beast! =P
1BAD89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 08:39 AM   #7
bigwhitecobra
Huh? Whatcha said?
 
bigwhitecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,073
Smile

God those are fun, aren't they?

Hey, Unit...got a few questions for you. Is there any reason why the 2.95 T-5 trans is 1" shorter in a Fox-body than the 3.35 T-5 in a SN-95? I found this out recently.
Also, the oil pump drive shaft on a Fox-body.....did it come with 4 complete twists in it? If not then I cam real close to seizing up the motor in the GT. Thanks man, later.

------------------
The Black Mamba 11.2@124
1994 Cobra
'00 Focus ZTS- K&N drop in. 10.66@66mph 1/8mile
bigwhitecobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 10:15 AM   #8
jimberg
Registered Member
 
jimberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
Post

Err, no twists in oil pump shaft. Boy, you sure did come close.

------------------
351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible
jimberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 07:46 PM   #9
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Post

The Fox body used both the 3.35, and the 2.95 1st gear ratio's.

I'm pretty sure the extra length is all related to the crossmember mounting on the SN95's being a little different. The input shaft on the SN95 cars is 7.85", the input shaft on the Fox is 7.18". So the bellhousing is also different, has to be longer to use the extra 3/4" of input shaft.

Swapping the input shaft and the front bearing retainer would enable you to convert an SN95 T-5 to 83-93 specs for fitment.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 11:42 PM   #10
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Post

Unit, if you get stuck with the headers, you can always bench press them for a good work out. Do you actually have a Cougar yet to put it in? A '67 will work and they are beautiful IMHO.

Rev

------------------
'66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph
1/4 mi.
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2001, 11:11 AM   #11
bigwhitecobra
Huh? Whatcha said?
 
bigwhitecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,073
Red face

I kinda figured that the oil pump shaft wasn't supposed to look that way. Wonder what happened?
Anyway, the only reason I can think of for making th einput shaft that much longer was to move the engine forward. I know my chances of being wrong are much like that snowball everybody keeps referring to, but that's what it looks like to me.

Unit, have you ever driven a 427? If not, then when you get it back together and running, just go ahead and start smiling, cause you won't stop for a very loooooonnnnggg time. I need a big block. wanna trade your 427 for a 351 with a S-trim?

Didn't think so.....maybe some other day then.
bigwhitecobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2001, 08:45 PM   #12
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Post

I cracked the block on this engine in 1981, when I was 4... Played fill the engine up (with water). Froze over the winter.

I've never driven the 427, but I have driven my Uncle's 428 Mach 1.

My dad has given this engine to me. It has to stay with me, I cannot sell it, regardless of the price. My dad ran low/mid 13's with it in a 1963 Ford Convertable.

If I had a car to put it in, it would be a far higher priority, lol. Years would become weeks, hahaha.

I'd love to put it into a Cougar, I love the way they look, and they are a little different.

The bonus for me is the extra parts he has. rods, cranks, pistons. He's also got a T-10, even though it's a little weak for the task. His close ratio was blown up by a friend years ago. The only thing I should actually need is an oil pickup, rings, bearings, gaskets and seals, and a really good magnaflux and welder. Hopefully the block is savable.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2001, 10:19 AM   #13
MiracleMax
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302:
I'm not sure I'll be able to run the heads either. At 11.1:1 compression, they were best suited to leaded only, super premium gas when it was availible. Octane booster, and lead additive will need to be in the gas to avoid detonation I think.
Get hardened exhaust valve seats, the intake should be okay, unless the metal is SUPER soft, the A/F mix will keep the intake side reasonably cool minimizing valve ressesion. I had a set of brand X 461 castings worked on and had hardened exhasut valve seats pressed in, the motor has been run hot several times and so far no problem
MiracleMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
raced a Supra Twin Turbo Stang35th Stang Stories 63 08-23-2003 12:36 AM
what size engine stand bolts? 82 GT Windsor Power 2 06-25-2003 11:13 PM
Stupid Question? SilverGT02 Modular Madness 4 07-06-2002 11:01 AM
Engine Size zach0 Classic Mustangs 5 08-28-2001 11:19 PM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Racer's Club House 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.


SEARCH