Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
11-01-2003, 01:32 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 532
|
Engine performance
Ok when I started this 6months ago I had a strict budget. I wanted a new 302 or rebuilt with some minor bolt ons just to mess around with once and a while at the track and still drive it daily so my buddy wanted to build me a engine hes a mechanic for over 25yrs and has built numerous engines and he had a 347 he wanted to get rid of so I know have a 347 but with all the bolt ons for a 302 and I cant afford to sell them and buy all new parts such as a bigger TB and better heads the TB is 65mm and the heads are GT40ps( which my buddy can port for me) with 1.6 rr's so I was thinkin since im not a serious racer how do you all think it will perform?
Heres a list of parts 65mm TB, TFS street heat upper and lower intake, GT40p heads, 1.6rr's 75mm mas air, 24#injectors for my NOS 5115 kit which im only lookin to spray about 100hp. I can always down the road bolt on some bad *** heads
__________________
90gt 347 and some bolt ons :-) RICE HATERS MEMBER #73 |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Engine transplant across decades and models. | Sketch | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 04-18-2004 07:51 AM |
| 1968 engine numbers, 289 or 302? | andybud | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 09-11-2003 12:14 PM |
| raced a Supra Twin Turbo | Stang35th | Stang Stories | 63 | 08-23-2003 12:36 AM |
| Will the 5.0 become obsolete | vetteeatr | Blue Oval Lounge | 36 | 07-11-2002 08:39 PM |
| Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Racer's Club House | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |