![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Gimme a Drink!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 694
|
![]() Has anyone used a G-Tech Pro and is it fairly accurate? Either the old G-Tech Pro or new $250 G-Tech Pro Competition.......
__________________
1990 GT,stock T-5,K&N w/o air silencer,March underdrives,FMS wires,timing@14*,PA Perf 130amp alt,Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter,Steeda adj quadrant/clutch cable/firewall adj,Centerforce II clutch,o/r x-pipe,Magnaflow SS catback,g-load brace, subframes,Bilstein struts/shocks,Autometer gauges, 136k and running strong! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockford
Posts: 596
|
![]() Quote:
It was with in .2 tenthes when a friend ran his car at the track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: At the north of the Maine
Posts: 177
|
![]() Is this hard to calibrate. I heard you have to know the weight of your car to get accurate reading.
As 0-60MPH and 1/4 mile right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Slidell, La
Posts: 31
|
![]() No, you only need the weight to calculate your horsepower. Makes no difference in acceleration numbers. My experiance with it was pretty good, within 1 to 2 tenths off. And that was the old Gtech Pro. Plus I love hooking it up to everybody's slow car to see what it runs, it's pretty fun.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tech? | Maroon91LX | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 03-04-2004 11:32 PM |
02 extentions--website for Interactive Tech? | Jason Van Holland | Windsor Power | 6 | 01-25-2001 02:07 PM |
Atlanta Tech Results | George Klass | Racer's Club House | 1 | 04-23-1999 08:44 PM |