Speed to a 3.8?

Gremlinx · 02-25-2003, 01:13 PM

Help!!! I need to stop getting outran by these japanese cars. What would be one of the better things to do to my 3.8? I have around $400 maybe a little more that i can spend on some performance. A buddy of mine reccomened a 3.73 gear rear end. I am not sure about what this will do to my gas mileage, and top speed, but i nkow that it helps a lot on 0-60 time. If anyone can help, please post a message.
Thanks,
Jason

Dark_5.0 · 02-25-2003, 02:21 PM

No doubt, go with gears they make a huge difference in acceleration. If I had a 3.8 I would go with 4.10's insteda of 3.73's......You need all the help you can get.

GodStang · 02-25-2003, 04:51 PM

I agree with Dark 5.0. Will not bother gas too much. Top speed what does it matter when will you be curising around at 120 + mph? You can get a ford set for $139 and installed for like $200.

Gremlinx · 02-25-2003, 10:41 PM

4.1 sounds great, but what about when i take this car for long trips? I dont want to be at 5500 rpms driving down the interstate. How big of a difference is the 4.1 compared to the 3.73? I have also heard that the 4.1 is more delicate than the others?

Miss Mischief · 02-26-2003, 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gremlinx
Help!!! I need to stop getting outran by these japanese cars. What would be one of the better things to do to my 3.8? I have around $400 maybe a little more that i can spend on some performance. A buddy of mine reccomened a 3.73 gear rear end. I am not sure about what this will do to my gas mileage, and top speed, but i nkow that it helps a lot on 0-60 time. If anyone can help, please post a message.
Thanks,
Jason

I had a 6 Psi Power Dyne Super charger Original for My 91 5.0 when it was stil a 5.0 Not convertated to the 5.7L. Anyway With very little Hard work On My Part I Had this Hooked up to my 2000 3.8L V-6 and was turning a full 273 HP at 5,500. Verse the Stock 190 Hp I think

Anyway Other then the Blower Kit I have made No Mods to it which means On its Bone stock 15" rims and stock rear end I have to start In 2nd and come off gently on the clutch or

I will Torch My Tires

Power Slide

Like this is a Bad thig?

Its Not Unless the Cops see her Butt side ways

Point? Look for a used Blower with your stock pistons and rings 6 to 8 psi wouldnt blow a Piston and would be fine on Pump Gas.

GodStang · 02-27-2003, 11:01 AM

Miss mischief why did you put a chevy engine into your mustang?

Miss Mischief · 02-27-2003, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GodStang
Miss mischief why did you put a chevy engine into your mustang?

A Ford 5.7L Is a 351?

Getty Up Go! Engine and Transmision Came From a F-250 SD with a 5.7L and Heavy duty Transmision.

A Chevy 5.7L Is a 350?

Efresh28 · 02-27-2003, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gremlinx
Help!!! I need to stop getting outran by these japanese cars. What would be one of the better things to do to my 3.8? I have around $400 maybe a little more that i can spend on some performance. A buddy of mine reccomened a 3.73 gear rear end. I am not sure about what this will do to my gas mileage, and top speed, but i nkow that it helps a lot on 0-60 time. If anyone can help, please post a message.
Thanks,
Jason

what year is your 3.8
i have a 2001 3.8 with no mods and i have no problems beating most imports

Gremlinx · 02-27-2003, 02:45 PM

1995. 145 bhp. I am not sure what my 0-60 time is, but it is a bit sluggish compared to the newer cars today. I got a price of $199 for the 3.73 gears, and aroun $350 for the installation. I dont have that kind of dough to lose gas mileage for a quicker car. I still drive it on long trips. I think i might go with the Diablo performance chip with a MAC cold air intake. That should help a bit, untill i graduate in august of 2004, then i can get something nice like a Mustang GT, or the Honda Civic Si. If Ford made the mustang a 4 cylinder car for cheaper insurnce purposes,and if it could do 0-60 in 7.2 and get at leats 24mpg city, then i would go with that, but that honda V-tec is amazing. I'm an American all the way, but if it starts to hurt my wallet, then i will have to jump ship to a more affordable vehicle.

Jason

GodStang · 02-27-2003, 04:55 PM

Miss Mischief

Doing the mathmatical conversion a 302 is a 4.9 and a 351 is a 5.7. Since Chevy's 350 is also 5.7 Ford bumpped it up one to a 5.8 L. And the 4.9 up to a 5.0. So the 302 is a 5.0 a Chevy 350 is a 5.7 and a Ford 351 is a 5.8. I was just curious because down here everyone put chevy engines into everything but chevys.

Efresh28 · 02-27-2003, 04:59 PM

and everyone puts ford rearends in everything else but fords

Miss Mischief · 02-27-2003, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GodStang
Miss Mischief

Doing the mathmatical conversion a 302 is a 4.9 and a 351 is a 5.7. Since Chevy's 350 is also 5.7 Ford bumpped it up one to a 5.8 L. And the 4.9 up to a 5.0. So the 302 is a 5.0 a Chevy 350 is a 5.7 and a Ford 351 is a 5.8. I was just curious because down here everyone put chevy engines into everything but chevys.

If she is a 5.8L I will change that and My way of thinking

But I remeber the 305 Chevey was a 5.0 Model avalible in there RS Model camareo "Just cause I hate them Doesnt mean I dont respect them" Anyway

Me and My Husband Love to go to Auto Shows With Getty Up Go! The 351 Converstion and "Ghost" His Classic, we would walk by all the beautiful shinny T Buckets and Dueces and Put a Big Chevy Bow Tye sticker Over the $10,000,000 Chomed Ford Radiator They had on the Nose of these things

If you never Noticed 90% of them where Built with a chevy short Block

Dark_5.0 · 02-28-2003, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Efresh28
what year is your 3.8
i have a 2001 3.8 with no mods and i have no problems beating most imports

What exactly do you think the average 1/4 mile time for a new V6 5 speed mustang is. All I see is 16's were I live @ 79-82mph.

Its getting scary over here there is a butt load of 13-15 second imports with just bolt ons and slicks.

GodStang · 02-28-2003, 12:01 PM

Average should be mid 15's at least. I have seen good drivers with no spare tire and no jack get 14.96 in the quarter.

Dark_5.0 · 02-28-2003, 01:44 PM

Mid 15's is nowhere near average for a V6 stang.

Nevermind, I dont even know what I am doing in this forum.

Later,

Efresh28 · 02-28-2003, 08:17 PM

you are not gonna get into the 14's unless you have some mods

GodStang · 03-01-2003, 01:38 PM

A stock 99 with spare and jack removed can get into the HIGH 14's. Now 1994 - 1998 should be mid 16's in the quarter.

Efresh28 · 03-01-2003, 07:40 PM

you are not gonna get into the 14's by dropping 15 to 20 pounds
now maybe if you drop the 15'to 20 pounds and add a cold air intake and dual exhaust

GodStang · 03-02-2003, 12:59 PM

Why do all of yall have problems with a V6 running with the older V8's? The 1999 and later V6's have 25 HP-35 HP less than 94-98 Gts but has 200 lbs less than those years. That makes up for alot. Not all of it but alot of it. PLus some of the V6's have 3.27's stock while the V8's have 2.73's.

Dark_5.0 · 03-03-2003, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by GodStang
Why do all of yall have problems with a V6 running with the older V8's? The 1999 and later V6's have 25 HP-35 HP less than 94-98 Gts but has 200 lbs less than those years. That makes up for alot. Not all of it but alot of it. PLus some of the V6's have 3.27's stock while the V8's have 2.73's.

HP is great but the 94-98 GT's have a little thing called torque. The difference between me and you is you are quoting times out of a magazine (ie, mag racing)......On the other hand I practicaly live at the track and I am telling you what I see.

I have seen 99+ V6 stangs spraying a 75 shot and running high 14's and I seen a guy spray a hundred shot and run a 14.4.

Mostly what I see is V6 stangs getting spanked by many a car length. When my 5.0 was stock it ran a 15.2 and I never even came close to losing to a V6 stang.

I am just calling it like I see it.

02-25-2003, 01:13 PM	#1
Gremlinx Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13	Speed to a 3.8? Help!!! I need to stop getting outran by these japanese cars. What would be one of the better things to do to my 3.8? I have around $400 maybe a little more that i can spend on some performance. A buddy of mine reccomened a 3.73 gear rear end. I am not sure about what this will do to my gas mileage, and top speed, but i nkow that it helps a lot on 0-60 time. If anyone can help, please post a message. Thanks, Jason

02-25-2003, 02:21 PM	#2
Dark_5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Staging lane Posts: 4,337	No doubt, go with gears they make a huge difference in acceleration. If I had a 3.8 I would go with 4.10's insteda of 3.73's......You need all the help you can get. __________________ 92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer

02-25-2003, 04:51 PM	#3
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	I agree with Dark 5.0. Will not bother gas too much. Top speed what does it matter when will you be curising around at 120 + mph? You can get a ford set for $139 and installed for like $200. __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

02-27-2003, 11:01 AM	#6
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	Miss mischief why did you put a chevy engine into your mustang? __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

02-27-2003, 04:55 PM	#10
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	Miss Mischief Doing the mathmatical conversion a 302 is a 4.9 and a 351 is a 5.7. Since Chevy's 350 is also 5.7 Ford bumpped it up one to a 5.8 L. And the 4.9 up to a 5.0. So the 302 is a 5.0 a Chevy 350 is a 5.7 and a Ford 351 is a 5.8. I was just curious because down here everyone put chevy engines into everything but chevys. __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

02-25-2003, 10:41 PM	#4
Gremlinx Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13	4.1 sounds great, but what about when i take this car for long trips? I dont want to be at 5500 rpms driving down the interstate. How big of a difference is the 4.1 compared to the 3.73? I have also heard that the 4.1 is more delicate than the others?

02-27-2003, 02:45 PM	#9
Gremlinx Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13	1995. 145 bhp. I am not sure what my 0-60 time is, but it is a bit sluggish compared to the newer cars today. I got a price of $199 for the 3.73 gears, and aroun $350 for the installation. I dont have that kind of dough to lose gas mileage for a quicker car. I still drive it on long trips. I think i might go with the Diablo performance chip with a MAC cold air intake. That should help a bit, untill i graduate in august of 2004, then i can get something nice like a Mustang GT, or the Honda Civic Si. If Ford made the mustang a 4 cylinder car for cheaper insurnce purposes,and if it could do 0-60 in 7.2 and get at leats 24mpg city, then i would go with that, but that honda V-tec is amazing. I'm an American all the way, but if it starts to hurt my wallet, then i will have to jump ship to a more affordable vehicle. Jason

02-27-2003, 04:59 PM	#11
Efresh28 Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: demotte, in Posts: 25	and everyone puts ford rearends in everything else but fords __________________ http://www.bigbossstreetracing.com

02-28-2003, 12:01 PM	#14
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	Average should be mid 15's at least. I have seen good drivers with no spare tire and no jack get 14.96 in the quarter. __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

02-28-2003, 01:44 PM	#15
Dark_5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Staging lane Posts: 4,337	Mid 15's is nowhere near average for a V6 stang. Nevermind, I dont even know what I am doing in this forum. Later, __________________ 92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer

02-28-2003, 08:17 PM	#16
Efresh28 Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: demotte, in Posts: 25	you are not gonna get into the 14's unless you have some mods __________________ http://www.bigbossstreetracing.com

03-01-2003, 01:38 PM	#17
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	A stock 99 with spare and jack removed can get into the HIGH 14's. Now 1994 - 1998 should be mid 16's in the quarter. __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

03-01-2003, 07:40 PM	#18
Efresh28 Registered Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: demotte, in Posts: 25	you are not gonna get into the 14's by dropping 15 to 20 pounds now maybe if you drop the 15'to 20 pounds and add a cold air intake and dual exhaust __________________ http://www.bigbossstreetracing.com

03-02-2003, 12:59 PM	#19
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	Why do all of yall have problems with a V6 running with the older V8's? The 1999 and later V6's have 25 HP-35 HP less than 94-98 Gts but has 200 lbs less than those years. That makes up for alot. Not all of it but alot of it. PLus some of the V6's have 3.27's stock while the V8's have 2.73's. __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Speed Secret # 3	jim_howard_pdx	Windsor Power	13	11-09-2002 10:35 AM
Please Comment of Speed Secret # 2	jim_howard_pdx	Windsor Power	20	11-06-2002 11:44 AM
Nitrous in a 5 speed car	Mustang_GT_90	Windsor Power	1	04-18-2002 01:31 PM
First ticket. Sucks, sucks bad.	zepherman	Blue Oval Lounge	46	12-16-2001 07:24 PM
3 speed Manual to a 3 speed Auto in a 66	T-N-T	Classic Mustangs	0	08-04-1999 08:45 AM