© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
03-28-2003, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ-USA
Posts: 114
|
AFR 185's w/E-303: Piston to valve clearance problems?
Here's going to be the setup I'm thinking of building. Stock 5.0 short block (crank, connecting rods, and Flat-top pistons), with Airflow Research's 185cc heads. They have 2.02int. with 1.60exh. valves. The e303 camshaft from Frpp has an advertised duration of 282/282 and a maximum valve lift of .498 with 1.6 rocker arms. My question first is anyone running this setup? and the other question is will i have any piston to valve clearance problems with flat top pistons? Oh and the Combustion chamber size on the heads is 61cc. Thanks for any info.
__________________
90redGT -Flowmaster mufflers -BBK 2.5" H-Pipe w/cats -BBK equal length shorty headers -K&N -BBK 65mm Throttle Body -Edelbrock performer 5.0 intake -3.73 gears |
03-28-2003, 05:25 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 220
|
you will have to fly cut the pistons thats why i went with the 165's
__________________
90 LX Hatchback 306, AFR 165's 58cc, E303, 1.6 roller rockers, 70mm throttle body, cobra intake, bbk fenderwell, bbk longtubes, x-pipe, flowmasters, pullies, msd 6a, crane ps-92, stock MAF sensor, electric fan, No AC, No air pump, flaming river quick ratio rack C-4, 3500 stall, 373's, aluminum driveshaft SSM Lift bars, , sub frame connectors, strut tower brace 12.57 @105.12mph w/ 1.686 60ft before bbk longtubes (with equal shorties) ----------------------------------------- 86 tube chassis coupe - the trailor queen |
03-28-2003, 10:04 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
|
185, stock cam,,, 165s, just about any cam...We like the HR266 from comp
__________________
88workcar 1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft Rice Hater # 42 To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle. |
03-28-2003, 11:09 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
|
As long as the duration measured at .050 lift is LESS than 230 degrees then lift DOES NOT MATTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is WHEN the valves are open, not how much they open that is the issue! You do not have to worry about flycutting the pistons as long as you follow that simple rule. The E-303 cam has a duration of 220 degrees at .050 lift. So that cam is not a problem even with 1.7 rockers. I don't care what heads are on the engine that cam is not a problem.
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!! |
03-29-2003, 10:35 AM | #5 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
Quote:
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
|
03-29-2003, 06:06 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
|
The only time that is true is if you have a 1986 5.0. The 86 5.0 had NO valve reliefs at all. 87 and up come with a valve relief already, not much of one but enough. I have installed AFR 205, Edelbrock Perf. RPM, Trick Flow Twisted Wedge, Holley Systemax, Ford Motorsport X and Y heads, Dart heads ALL on stock short block 5.0's of 87' vintage or newer, and with a variety of cam's that as long as the duration @ .050 is NO MORE than 230 degree's then you WILL NOT have a problem! Period! You see with the shorter duration cams (less that 230 deg.) the valve is simply NOT OPEN anywhere near the piston during operation. At least not near enough to be a problem on a Hyd. Roller engine that does not see over 6,300 rpm.
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!! |
03-29-2003, 06:10 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
|
Even with the use of 1.7 rockers. I do not care what the lift #'s are. If the duration is less than 230 degree's @ .050 lift then you can have .750 lift if you want. At that lift the piston is going down the hole on intake and the valve is closing from that lift on exhaust when the piston is comming back up the hole.
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!! |
03-29-2003, 08:01 PM | #8 |
Sniffed too much n20
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Ont, Canada
Posts: 1,018
|
I think I'm getting your thinking Technik. When I get my heads back (1.90 Edelbrock's milled .010") with a TFS Stage 2 cam, I will have problems on my exhaust valve right? Since its 224 and 232 with .542 and .563 lift.
__________________
2002 Windsor Weekend Q16 Qualifier |
03-30-2003, 11:45 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 68
|
so then AFR 205's would work with an E-303?
|
04-01-2003, 07:50 PM | #10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Walker, MI, USA
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
__________________
Engine: steel mounts, Under drive pulleys, K&N, GT-40 Intake ported Lower, No power steering, No A/C, Mac cold intake, 65MM TB, 255 Fuel pump, 24's, AFR 165 58cc, Rocker Arms 1.7with the stock Cam, 1 5/8 short headers, offRoad X-pipe Drive Train: 3.55, T-5 with a Pro 5.0 shifter 12.656@107.71MPH See It at www.T-racing.com/mustang.htm |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Piston to Valve Clearance Check - 351W | Peldor | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 01-31-2008 08:29 PM |
Any piston to valve clearance prob with AFR 165's? | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 2 | 03-09-2003 12:39 AM |
Piston to valve clearance - How much do I need? | 2FastLX | Windsor Power | 6 | 03-29-2001 04:54 PM |
Please - I need advice on piston to valve clearance ASAP | 2FastLX | Windsor Power | 8 | 03-18-2001 03:05 PM |
Piston to Valve Clearance question | MAstang5O | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-07-2001 10:34 PM |