© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
07-26-2000, 11:07 PM | #1 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
Rear upper control arms
I was thinking about getting a panhard rod to control axle movement in corners but I can't afford it right now. I was wondering if upper control arms make a noticeable difference in lateral stability. For the future I am planning lower control arms (Maximum Motorsports or Global West) so I'd need something that will work with these but I don't think either company makes uppers. Or will the lowers make a noticeable difference? I need help on this one.
------------------ GT-40 heads (ported, polished, + milled), B303 cam, 1.7rr's, JE pistons, Offy intake, Holley carb, Flowtech 1 5/8" shortys, Flowtech X-pipe, MAC Flowpath exhaust, MAC pulleys, 373's, subframes, Eibachs+Tokicos, B+M ripper, FMS Clutch, Zoom Quadrant+cable, 17" CSA Ultra rims, 235/45ZR17 Yokohama AVS S4's, Carbed, Naturally Aspirated, and Nasty! |
07-31-2000, 03:09 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,349
|
The GW's have the Del-alum bushing on the axle side, and is suppose to laterally locate the axle. Apparantly it does do a good job, but there is some bind associated with it... and thus it isn't possible to use a panhard rod with the GW LCA's (as the panhard goes through it's arc, the axle must move laterally... but the GW's prevent it).
Just using the GW LCA's is probably the simplest band-aid solution. The upper control arms are crap... but ones with stiffer bushings are even WORSE. They are angled so that they bind, and reduce the lateral motion of the axle. Using firmer uppers will eliminate the 'snap' oversteer, but it adds even more bind... it's arguably better than stock for the dragstrip, but it's not a good idea for handling (factory five does sell a cheap, complete set). Also, the UCA's inclination (upwards towards the front) causes AWEFUL rear jacking when breaking. It'd be best to think about getting rid of the uppers... check out the "Lateral location of rear axle" post for some other options. |
08-01-2000, 11:10 AM | #3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Livonia, MI, USA
Posts: 1,194
|
Either OR (not both).
Decide on a company, and stick with it. Panhards and control arms are a dangerous combination IF you go between companies (not designed for it). Stick with ONE company. Personally, I like Griggs. Then get the "kit" one piece at a time as money falls from the sky :-) Get the whole enchalada kit over a period of time, but DONT mix/match companies. ------------------ Darius Rudis Roadracer: Home built t-arm/panhard suspension powered by an S-trimmed motor :-) My Mustang Page |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
front control arms | schizcat | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-09-2003 08:07 AM |
Control Arms?Does anyone have any recommendations on rear control arms? Do I really n | schizcat | Windsor Power | 5 | 08-28-2003 09:53 PM |
Do control arms really help 60" times?? | Blaster | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-13-2002 01:29 AM |
Anyone find Ford's front lower control arms yet? | LOCASH | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-08-2001 09:17 PM |
rear control arms | 93lx | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-16-2001 06:32 PM |